

What, for people to wear on their fingers to keep oil off or something?
What, for people to wear on their fingers to keep oil off or something?
Funny, but obviously not realistic. If those two just charged him they easily would have knocked him over, but they just sort of poke him with their shields and back off when he’s instable. “Not choreographed” but still obviously planned.
They can outside of the UK, but for stuff accessible in the UK, they can’t. To be specific, I think it’s that they can’t recommend one to get around this law. They can in general, but not to avoid the law.
Yeah, that’s what I said.
I assume the planned release date for 1.0 is staying the same though. This doesn’t buy them any more time. It only delays the time where they’d get feedback from the community. You can always wait for early access to be over if you want. This is all that was delayed, not 1.0.
They can’t recommend using a VPN, but they can say “some users are illegally subverting the ban using a VPN. For more information on this subject see: [link to VPN guide].”
Early Access is being delayed. They were releasing early access to let users give feedback. Now that feedback will be delayed, which allows them to make mistakes that may have been avoidable if they heard from players sooner.
That being said, the current course of action, regardless of justification, is actually going to get us a better game in the end.
Eh, I’m not sure about that. Sure, a more complete initial launch (probably still early access), but will 1.0 be better, or after that? Part of what made previous games good was getting user feedback early in early access. Sure, they played less complete versions, but it allowed them to direct where the game was heading sooner.
Also, how much does this hurt morale of the team? Are they still going to care about the project as much with their owners fucking around with the project? If they don’t care as much, the final product is almost certainly worse.
I agree, but Subnautica was more about exploration than just survival. Sure, you could keep expanding the world to add new environments, but eventually that gets out of hand. For a Subnautica type game, making new ones makes sense, especially to address tech debt as well and start fresh.
Community Policing is effective and doesn’t have the same issues. The problem with police is they aren’t accountable, and often not even part of the community. They have no issue doing whatever the hell they want, because it won’t come back to hurt them.
Community Policing is by regular people in the community, who work together to keep everyone safe. They’re accountable and know/are known by everyone else in the community. If they do something bad, they’re going to have consequences.
Policing is required, just not this kind.
I would argue yes. Before we had clothes no one would have cared, but now most people think it’s weird to see other humans naked. I don’t know what you’d call that if not brainwashed.
The Deck has done incredibly well, but they can’t manufacture enough to make your numbers make sense. Also, last I saw, Linux streaming was around 5%.
However, yeah, most people won’t know how to use these tools. There will probably be a ton of sites that pop up temporarily that don’t have age verification. Any time they go after them it’ll go down, and a new one will appear. They’ll be sketchy sites, but that’s how most people will avoid it if they want to avoid it.
What is brainwashing if not forced adaptation to manufactured requirements?
Yeah, it won’t be good, but it’s going to happen eventually. Sooner is better.
Sure, but it would still effect the cost unless there is literally zero demand. Less space is less space. It doesn’t matter how well it’s being utilized. Better utilization would decrease costs though, and yeah have tons of side benefits. Zoning should be fixed whether this is built or not, everywhere.
I really think someone needs to make a modern evolution of Dark Cloud. Maybe the technological limitation was actually a benefit though, because a modern game would probably try to do open world, full 3d construction, and things like that. The technology at the time required that they keep it fairly simple but also really well designed.
To the gut? It doesn’t matter what the round is. You’re going to the ICU. A .22 isn’t as non-lethal as the memes like to make it out to be, and your gut is a bunch of very critical soft tissue.
If it’s to the arm or something, fine. Anywhere in the torso, you’re going to the ICU most likely.
Traffic, increased infrastructure demand, as well as increased power putting a strain on the power network requiring upgrades. It also takes potential employees from other workplaces, increasing their costs. Obviously water (which they can mostly elimate, but still). The space also can’t be used for housing or anything else, so increases the cost of housing. There’s also probably tons of effects we wouldn’t even think about.
I have a question. Is this for you in the future, or for someone who may find it? If it’s the latter, and it’s just information you want to store, not media, I’d just go with paper. Storing digital data is both hard and error prone, and it also requires them to have the technology and power to read it. If things really go to hell, this isn’t a guarantee. Paper ensures they can at least view it no matter what. It’ll degrade eventually, but it’ll hold up better than digital.
An ammo box is probably cheaper than a pelican case. I’d go for that no matter what.
It’s my opinion that we should be making cemeteries parks. I know I personally would be much happier if, when I die, and if I were to have a grave, that the space would be useful. Also, the “headstone” could instead be park equipment, like a bench or swings or something. Maybe some space could be set for gardens, and you can choose to be buried there. I don’t understand cemeteries that are made solely for bodies to be thrown in and mostly not useful to society.