• vxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    It needs way more people, because I guess a lot of people from all over the world used VPNs to sign the petition and will get nullified.

    So if you planned to do it, don’t, you will hurt your goals more than you’re doing an good.

  • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Anti-murder laws are cuttailing my choice! What if I someday would like to make a choice to murder someone?

  • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Copyright was invented so artists would be able to sell their art, and more art would be made.

    When copyright is protected on a product that’s no longer sold, less art is made.

    When a copyright holder stops selling their art, copyright protections should immediately cease, and they should be responsible for copyright obligations - releasing the source code to the public. Use it or lose it!

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This is the most level headed approach to IP I’ve seen. If you’re not willing to use the property you forfeit it. It’s a common contact for licensing rights for movies that forces a studio to make a movie or lose rights. That way people can’t squat on a licence to prevent others using it.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Sony has to make a Spiderman movie every few years even though DVDs of the old ones are still being sold, but Ubisoft can just delete games forever and they can never be played again.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “… curtail developer choice” - This from a bunch of people for whom the term ‘executive meddling’ was created.

    • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Sounds like they just put together a bunch of meaningful sounding words. I know what they want to say though: "Noooo! But mah freedumbs! NOOOO 😭 "

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 hours ago

    When you work hard to create a consumer economy, the first rule is, don’t piss off the consumers!

  • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Developer choice, ha-ha, very funny. I am not familiar with the industry and still feel safe to bet most of them (edit: actual software developers making games) just want to get enough money for doing what they can do without too much stress/disgust and also most of them don’t have a desire to see their work die just because some manager decided it is time to make some other games instead

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I bet they’re really pissed off with ubisoft right now. They basically started this whole movement by being so egregious with The Crew. Less than a month before they shut the servers down the game was still on sale for the full price that it had launched with.

      Granted it was shut down because it was the most mediocre game ever made but that still isn’t an excuse.

      • Nikls94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Tbh when I read of it, being an open world driving game where you can just drive around a very large area, I kind of wanted it. Not as a game, but simply for driving around. MarioKart is too happy for that. I just want to get lost in thoughts while driving.

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Whenever a large games company talks about “developer choice” you know they’re referring to one of a few things:

    1. Think of the shareholders!
    2. Think of the rich CEO who adds zero value to the company!
    3. The people don’t know what they want and therefore we need to tell them exactly what they want and need!
  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    This initiative sure would make things more complicated for the game publishers, yes.

    Because they’re currently not doing the bare minimum.

    If they weren’t so accustomed to not doing the bare minimum, maybe they would have different opinions! Just saying.

    Edit: Just signed the petition. Didn’t think this was necessary before because, as soon as I heard of it, Finland was already top of the list percentage wise. But I did sign it, just for the hell yeah of it.

    • Klear@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It’s not just for the hell of it!

      Invalid votes will be removed when it’s time for the final tally, so the initiative needs a solid buffer to still he over a million after.

      There’s been a talk of some people using bots to inflate the numbers in a misguided attempt to help the initiative, so every vote is still very welcome.

      Also, I kinda want to see just how high Finland can go above the threshold.

      Tell your friends!

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I wouldn’t be surprised if the game industry isn’t also using bots to inflate the numbers to make people procrastinating not feel the need to contribute and make the petition look less valid.

        • Klear@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Eh, doubtful. The initiative got a shitton of extra coverage as it was nearing/reached the goal. They would have preferred if it went a lot slower.

  • qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why are publishers speaking for devs about how much choice devs would have? Why not get devs to speak?

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Because most devs are just codemonkeys implementing what they’re told to. This is pure manipulative propaganda from the suits who are already robbing wages from good devs.