I just went to charge my kitchen scale and it wouldn’t work until I dug out a USB-A -> C cable and plugged it into my desktop…

It just reminded me of how many devices like that I have. This scale, my wife’s sound torc, some car jumperstarters, and I think a one or two more…

I assume it’s because they just slap a usbc port on a dumb 5v circuit that doesn’t have a power negotiation controller. So the cable and the charger cant figure out the power needs of the device are and just never send any.

  • brokenlcd@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    All of that because they couldn’t be bothered to put two resistors for the detect pin.

    Remember, line must go up at any cost.

    • nick@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Bro have you SEEN the price of resistors lately?

      ……cuz I haven’t and I assume it’s fractions of a penny per.

  • r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    But wait. Doesn’t this make them both dumb? I’d expect a modern USB-C charger to still support basic 5v low current lazy devices too. If there’s a USB-A to C cable that works, it must also still be possible to send the basic 5v down a C-C cable.

    I also think there’s always going to be a balance between how much a device needs to make and/or how much it needs fast charging to make sense to add the charging circuit for PD/PPS. Even $1-2 on top of the cost can ruin margins in the current electronic market.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      USB c has active negotiation for power and communication via a cc pin

      The usb a to c cable has a pull up resistor that mimics this and says “give 5v”

      Some usb c chargers have a fallback 5v mode for this scenario but not all do

    • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      PD includes a 5v option, so you’d think that chargers would default to a dumb 5v/4.5w with no other input, but apparently not… It’s probably something to do with the overcharge protection, or to not (further) harm a device with a damaged charge controller.

      Or it could be that my PD chargers are pre pandemic and PD 3.1 fixed this.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well, I’d expect that if they allowed 5v through but with a low current limit (I think the default 5v standard states quite a low current allowance). They could catch anything drawing too much and shut the port off until it detects disconnection/other reset.

        I mean, if they’re thinking about protecting a downstream device, adding this logic would make more sense than just not supplying any power unless a negotiation is made.

        In any case, since standard USB ports on a computer will output 5v without anything being negotiated, then it’s really no less safe than any other USB port in that regard.

  • Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Surface Pro X is the worst about this. It knows you’re trying to charge it via the USB c ports. And tells you to use their stupid charger instead.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Agreed. Learned this the hard way with my portable 4g router. It’s the pickiest gadget I own with cord and plug selection and it left me hanging when I really needed it and I don’t carry an A to C cord often. I wish I could find a good alternative to the Netgear Nighthawk M1100

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have a few routers by them, but not this one. That’s really cool for in the city but I worry about reception. The main reason I got the nighthawk was to see if I could log into work from a hot spring with spotty reception. It has antenna ports hidden under the little rubber feet and it does help the range a lot. Still haven’t tried the hot spring, but I tried it at a family member in the country’s house where the reception is weak and it got me a usable signal. Thanks for sharing. I’ll look into glinet a bit more.