Edit: WE DON’T TALK ABOUT NUMBER 11.
What else do these all have in common?
They all have art styles that are purposefully designed to be really cheap and easy to make. The same choices that helped these studios crank out hours upon hours of formulaic content also helps the rule 34 artists.
Yup. Flat colors, thick ink lines, and very little detail. The goal is for animators to be able to reproduce the art quickly and reliably, to be able to churn out dozens of seasons.
How does Lisa and Meg beat out Lois Hayley and Amy. Wft is that shit.
Haha what kind of degenerate do you have to be to find any of these characters hot enou-
Amy Wong
We shouldn’t judge others so harshly…
Lisa Simpson? Louise Belcher? Aren’t they little kids?
|>11 Maggie Simpson
This has to be bots, please. Someone has to be just fucking around. This can’t be real.
Yeah I went ahead and blurred that out of the image
I doubt you don’t know that not only this is very real, but it’s not even close to the worse rule34 and similar have to offer.
No I don’t know and I didn’t want to know. I purposely avoid this shit.
There’s a lot of funny shit out there. Like “personality_excretion”. It’s such a wild concept that I don’t know whether to laugh or cry, but you gotta acknowledge the creativity
What does that even mean?
Probably long form comics that have Maggie in the intro panel doing nothing. Or so I’m choosing to believe.
Isn’t it obvious?
Drawing porn of animated characters looks close to the real drawing.
Also, all those are from sitcoms that teenagers watch, like no duhhh
Skrillex?
princess bean is also like 16 i think like a 4th is ilegal
Well no she doesn’t exist, she doesn’t have an age and so it’s not illegal. These are fictional characters
Lisa Simpson being 2nd is vile wallahi 🤮
R34 doesn’t allow loli or shota content anymore. So all of the content of children is just them aged up looking like actual adults. Still questionable, but better.
The fraction of teenage/underage girls on that list is too damn high (hell, Louise is 9)
Controversial opinion: If killing npcs in video games is fine and shouldn’t land you in prison for murder, because they are fictional and not real people, then porn of “underage” fictional characters is also fine and shouldn’t be illegal.
Finding something disgusting is not a proper reason to make something illegal. The only relevant aspect is whether it causes harm to others or not.
- Csam harms children -> should be illegal and punished
- fictional drawings don’t harm anyone bevause no actual people involved -> should be legal
In the UK it doesn’t matter if its a photo of a real person or not, porn that depicts a child is illegal.
Tbh I think with the use of AI at this point this might be a pretty good law to have. “It was AI generated” is not a defence. Realistically if you are doing it for yourself no one will find out so there is some kind of argument as to it being harmless, but when you start doing other things with those images such as using them for blackmail the police should be able to use that as sufficient evidence to charge you.
That’s just the UK though. They have their own issues
We certainly have issues, but intolerance of paedophilia isn’t one of them. I’m happy we see it that way.
That’s the thing. Y’all do tolerate it. There’s article after article about letting them get away with just a slap on the wrist
I’m not talking about legal judgement (I practically never do) and I’m not even talking bout legit PDF files.
It’s just disgusting that rule 34 of literal children scores this high.
You can say “pedophiles”.
But saying PDF files is funny
Don’t discrace the good name of my friend, Portable Document Format
Adobe did that a long time ago.
Lisa Simpson??? Please no tell me this is joke
BART GET OUT, I’M PISS
Do you porn? Hard to miss this. It’s really popular. I don’t get it, but often see thumbs of her portrayed as an older teen.
Honest question since i’m not a guy: When you guys are masturbating to Lisa Simpson do you think.you are fucking her in 3D or 2D? Are you a simpson character or is she a yellow little girl? Just trying to.understand your minds
Regardless, this is very fucked up, but I’m curious anyway
Okay, I can’t speak for this extremely fucked up example, but in general it’s very simple:
- see shape which sufficiently resembles (partially) naked woman, maybe in suggestive pose
- neuron activation
- you are now horny
There is no need to imagine any fucking, seeing the image is enough to get you into the mood, looking at it long enough (or at different images for long enough) will get you most of the way there, and the hand can take care of the rest
2D but feeling 3D
Regardless, this is very fucked up, but I’m curious
It’s normal.(We are degenerate 😣)
Er, that’s not the most worrying thing about someone jerking to Lisa Simpson.
What you need to worry about is the fact she’s 8 years old.
She is 38, in the episode Bart to the Future.
Episodes where Lisa is 38 = 1
Episodes where Lisa is a child = 767
I think it is more than 1… https://www.imdb.com/list/ls056380696/
Comment section full of idiots thinking this is real.
Just FYI: https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=icame
It’s Rule 34. It’s always real.
Its probably because anyone into anime is using a booru, like a normal person.
Is booru a site or an app
Its an image board style, like a Chan (4chan, 8chan etc).
Safebooru, danbooru and gelbooru are some of the booru’s I know.
