Yeah and if i made an art panel that tricked people into stepping in shit id be an asshole, not an artist. I hear the same sentiment of your argument all the time and i think it is utterly ridiculous.
So a better analogy would be your cat puking on you in the middle of the night? It’s a highly emotional performance that’s audience interactable, top shelf art.
So you’re saying they made this movie with the intent of being shit filled with advertisements and to feel like a waste of 90 minutes? Throughout the whole creative process, that was the goal?
Stepping in shit makes me feel something, but it is not art.
It’s a readymade interactive art piece. That will be 30 million dollars.
Sorry, you need to tape the poop to a wall for it to be art.
Or put it in a can
Why did I read that entire wiki?
Someone fork up 150k please and find out if he actually shit into the can.
It’s a companion piece to Fountain by Marcel Duchamp.
Fountain: #2
yeah, but nobody made it with the intent of you stepping in it
that is a very poor comparison.
Yeah and if i made an art panel that tricked people into stepping in shit id be an asshole, not an artist. I hear the same sentiment of your argument all the time and i think it is utterly ridiculous.
So a better analogy would be your cat puking on you in the middle of the night? It’s a highly emotional performance that’s audience interactable, top shelf art.
So you’re saying they made this movie with the intent of being shit filled with advertisements and to feel like a waste of 90 minutes? Throughout the whole creative process, that was the goal?
Anything coming out of Hollywood is not art either, so the point is valid.