• MetalMachine@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    She failed to differentiate herself from biden in many different ways. One of which was her stance on genocide. Less people generally came out and voted for her in part due to these factors

      • Corn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Remember the cops beating the shit out of students across the country? If she pledged to end support for Israel, instead of being “the other genocide candidate”, Trump would have been the “resume genocide” candidate, and all those politically activated students would be getting their friends to vote. Between that and their response to 2020, they showed the next generation that the democrats are a dead end for enacting social change.

        • Zexks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Trump IS the BURN ALL PALESTINIANS AND TURN GAZA INTO YHE VEGAS OF THE MIDDLE EAST candidate. And that was somehow better. But yeah you’re right. We should capitulate the entire country and everything else because of that right. Fuck it, if we can’t have perfection let’s just burn it all down.

          • Wolf@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            From the POV of someone who just wants the Genocide to stop, “Burning all Palestinians and tuning Gaza into New Vegas” and “Burning all Palestinians and tuning Gaza into vacation homes for rich Israelis” is functionally equivalent.

            That was by no means the only issue I based my vote on, but I also don’t think it’s unreasonable for someone to conclude that voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil

            • Zexks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              Well one of those evils is going to control you and everyone else one way or another so yes it is unreasonable to not vote for damage mitigation.

              • Wolf@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                Hence why I said that wasn’t the only factor in determining my vote.

                The question is though, where will it end? I’m 51 years old and ever since I have been able to vote the choices have been between a shit bag, and an even worse shit bag.

                At some point we have to put pressure on the DNC to put up someone who is actually woth voting for, and if they know we will always vote for the lesser evil, what incentive do they have to change their strategy?

                Harris was already a Republican in all but name and she only looked good compared to Hitler 2.0, if this trend continues the only “choice” will be between a far right fascist, and an extremely far right fascist.

                • Zexks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 days ago

                  It will never end. It has been this way since we walked rivers and fought with sticks and it’ll be this way until the last black holes evaporate. You’re 51 and still haven’t learned this. Are you even paying attention at this point.

  • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    If Bernie would’ve been warning about this in 2023, he would’ve been called red fash.