• Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        This is a genuine photograph of six men in striped bathing suits in the early 1900s. However, we’ve found no evidence to support the claim that it was taken at a beauty contest.

        The earliest internet postings of the photo we could find came in articles concerning the early days of swimsuit fashion. In 2012, Angus Trumble, the Director of the National Portrait Gallery of Australia in Canberra, provided a little more information about the photograph’s origins.

        In a brief anecdote, Trumble wrote that the photo was originally available as a postcard captioned “Schöner durch Streifen. Mitteleuropa um 1910,” which translates roughly to “men made more beautiful by stripes. Central Europe around 1910.”

        The anecdote in question:

        Last evening over an early dinner in New York a dear old friend visiting from Australia gave me this postcard which he found lately in a museum bookshop in Germany. The caption reads Schöner durch Streifen. Mitteleuropa um 1910. The first phrase is difficult to translate with equal concision, but surely means [men made more] beautiful by stripes, and presumably therefore drips with irony.

  • bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    The heads seem photoshopped on to the bodies. Or did the skin tone of all their faces just differ that wildly from their bodies’ back then?

    • shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Bigorexia is a real thing nowadays. The male body standard inflation on social media is just wild… unless you’re on gear, cut down to 6% body fat and in good lighting you’d get ratio’d into oblivion

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I know those words, but I don’t think they’re being used in a manner to which I’m accustomed.

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            They can tell just by looking that I don’t take steroids right? Like I don’t have to actually talk to them?

            • shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Yeah you can generally tell, the neck and shoulders have more androgen receptors so they will typically have bulbous shoulders, oversized traps and a thick neck. Other giveaways are early balding, back acne, and rapid muscle gain. And huge mass monsters are pretty obvious. If you were really interested you could take a look at Jesse James West on YouTube. He’s about the peak muscularity someone can reasonably achieve without steroids outside of genetically gifted individuals. He interviews gym girls often and they rate him so low haha.

            • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s not one or the other. You can lift heavy things, not do steroids and not have skinny arms. You can also have skinny arms if you don’t want to lift heavy things and are perfectly content with them. But let’s not frame this as a binary choice because it isn’t.

      • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wish more people would be open about it. Alan Ritchson is one of the few Hollywood celebrities that has candidly spoken about his use of exogenous testosterone to prepare for his role as Reacher, but clearly so many others are getting help. I’m in my late 50s trying to add muscle mass, and it’s a huge challenge. I’d say that I’m better off than all of the men in this 1919 photo, but not by that much.

    • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      If anything, it shows how naive and credulous we became. Old photos with completely made up rubbish captions are now a staple of social media.

    • Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      People used to do this weird thing called going outside. Believe it or not, they’d spend most of their waking hours doing this weird habit and they were also typically fully dressed too. It was considered scandalous to be caught outside not fully clothed. So the deadly laser that is our Sun would fry their uncovered face much faster than the skin beneath their clothes.

  • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I spend copious hours in the gym because I never ever want to look like this. I was thinking about skipping today because it’s raining, so thanks for the motivation.

      • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would describe it as skinny fat but these guys are not fat, so I think the problem is that they have very little muscle all around.

          • OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I remember discussing this in private school, I suggested its possible use was for portable masturbation on long trips lol.

          • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sure. But also we know what an active body looks like and it’s not like this. They look like normal guys who don’t get much excercise. Look at people living in pre industrial tribes, Greco Roman beauty standards etc. not saying it’s wrong to look like that, but I personally do not want to look like that. I think we look best with a little bit of muscle on.

              • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Cmon that photo you linked makes my point exactly. The tribesmen clearly have better muscle mass. Just look at the man in the far right, that dude has fairly developed biceps and shoulders. Guy on the far left, I think I even see some vascularity.

                I think you might be looking at the chest only, which is actually pretty hard to build without weightlifting so it makes sense that neither would look like what our idea of muscular is in the modern day. Even the first bodybuilders had “underdeveloped “ chests.