A 2025 Tesla Model 3 in Full-Self Driving mode drives off of a rural road, clips a tree, loses a tire, flips over, and comes to rest on its roof. Luckily, the driver is alive and well, able to post about it on social media.

I just don’t see how this technology could possibly be ready to power an autonomous taxi service by the end of next week.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      To put your number into perspective, if it only failed 1 time in every hundred miles, it would kill you multiple times a week with the average commute distance.

      • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Someone who doesn’t understand math downvoted you. This is the right framework to understand autonomy, the failure rate needs to be astonishingly low for the product to have any non-negative value. So far, Tesla has not demonstrated non-negative value in a credible way.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You are trying to judge the self driving feature in a vacuum. And you can’t do that. You need to compare it to any alternatives. And for automotive travel, the alternative to FSD is to continue to have everyone drive manually. Turns out, most clowns doing that are statistically worse at it than even FSD, (as bad as it is). So, FSD doesn’t need to be perfect-- it just needs to be a bit better than what the average driver can do driving manually. And the last time I saw anything about that, FSD was that “bit better” than you statistically.

          FSD isn’t perfect. No such system will ever be perfect. But, the goal isn’t perfect, it just needs to be better than you.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            FSD isn’t perfect. No such system will ever be perfect. But, the goal isn’t perfect, it just needs to be better than you.

            Yeah people keep bringing that up as a counter arguement but I’m pretty certain humans don’t swerve off a perfectly straight road into a tree all that often.

            So unless you have numbers to suggest that humans are less safe than FSD then you’re being equally obtuse.

                • jamesjams@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Bleep bleep bloop indeed human, affirmative, am human, …thinking… Well to the best of my knowledge anyway