• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 13th, 2024

help-circle

  • I had this problem at work a week ago or so, at least with Fujitsu PCs. For them, the main cause isn’t an empty CMOS battery, but rather that Fujitsu generally had too little BIOS cache, since there is nothing about it in the UEFI standard. The update basically overfilled that cache, rendering the BIOS completely unusable. The POST doesn’t even go through fully.

    The PC are sort of bricked, you gotta put the mainboard into recovery mode, put the ROM file on a freeBSD formatted stick and wait until you see instructions on the screen. Follow them, restart the PC. I recommend setting the BIOS to the optimized default settings, as not doing that might make the boot of Windows pretty slow in some cases. I did hear that it can delete the keys from the TPM, but I haven’t seen that with my PCs at work.







  • Possibilities are all possible outcomes of a certain scenario. With the example of a coin toss, it’s heads or tails. However, these are dependent on your definition of what you want to observe. For example, at a dice roll, you could define the possibilities as:

    • any number less than 5 is rolled
    • a 5 is rolled
    • a 6 is rolled

    Probabilities are attached to possibilities. They define how likely an outcome is. For example, in an ideal coin toss heads and tails have a probabilitiy of 0.5 (or 50%) each.

    With my 2nd example, the probabilities would be:

    • any number less than 5 is rolled: 4/6 (or 2/3 or 0.666… or 66.666…%)
    • a 5 is rolled (1/6 or 0.1666… or 16.666…%)
    • a 6 is rolled (1/6 or 0.1666… or 16.666…%)

    All probabilities must add up to 1.0 (or 100%), otherwise your possibilities overlap, which is generally not something you want.


    Plausibility is a bit more tricky, as it also depends on your definition, namely a cutoff point. You could see the cutoff point as a limit of how much you want to risk. I’ll only examine the example for the coin toss for that. Say you will toss a coin 100 times. This would mean there are 2100 possibilities, but we will examine only 2 for this matter:

    • you will get 100 times tails
    • you will get as many tails as heads

    Let’s say the cutoff point is 0.01, i.e. 1%. This would make the first possibility improbable, as 1/(2100) is far lower than 0.01. The second possibility is 0.5, which is greater than 0.01, and therefore probable.



  • But do you also sometimes leave out AI for steps the AI often does for you, like the conceptualisation or the implementation? Would it be possible for you to do these steps as efficiently as before the use of AI? Would you be able to spot the mistakes the AI makes in these steps, even months or years along those lines?

    The main issue I have with AI being used in tasks is that it deprives you from using logic by applying it to real life scenarios, the thing we excel at. It would be better to use AI in the opposite direction you are currently use it as: develop methods to view the works critically. After all, if there is one thing a lot of people are bad at, it’s thorough critical thinking. We just suck at knowing of all edge cases and how we test for them.

    Let the AI come up with unit tests, let it be the one that questions your work, in order to get a better perspective on it.


  • I mean, Theranos was less classic ethical nightmare as it was just a grift, separating suckers from their money. A possible more fitting example in the same vein would be Roger Wakefield’s “studies” on how the MMR vaccines cause autism., where actual children got harmed and spurred on the antivax movement.



  • Funnily enough, the Stanford Prison experiment was pretty much just an act, with both parties encouraged to act the way they did. It’s been discredited nowadays.

    A better analogy would be the Milgram experiment(s). Often repeated, breaking certain ethical rules (e.g. not telling your test subjects the whole truth about the experiment), with the result of some test subjects taking their own life from the sheer realisation of what they did, and yet the experiment still stands uncontested in its results.


  • Blemgo@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlSteam Reviews
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    I think it can be both. However they are no justification as to why one should buy and like a game they clearly won’t like for various reasons. Even more, trying to “fix” a game can alter the game’s impact on the player. There’s a reason why roguelikes/roguelites are so hard, and taking away the difficulty will lessen the experience. That’s why most people also, for example, won’t use cheating tools for their single player games apart from screwing around.