Sweet! I still need to watch the show from a couple years ago, that got better reviews lol

This movie’s main issue is that given the choice, I’d still rather watch the 1987 release. Like most remakes, it didn’t exceed its predecessor enough to justify its own existence.

Gimme that 2012 Dredd though, that was sick.

He experienced life threatening heart conditions in his late 30s from alcohol and drugs, and went clean after that.

Mate, I was fully prepared to create alt accounts and review boost it past 6, but it’s already 6.2. Crisis averted.

Now the RT score though, critics got it so SO wrong.

• Brüno - 5.9
• The Ringer - 5.8
• MacGruber - 5.5
• Jingle All The Way - 5.6

I’m not gonna defend them as super great movies but I do feel they are underrated by a point. If Bruno dropped before the world saw Borat I think it would have been better recieved.

Look at this nerd they probably reads books

Work hard, learn to code, master the fundamentals, excel beyond your peers and you might have a real chance at… being laid off by embracer, microsoft or ubisoft. Sigh.

The emotions he had during a few of the songs, I chalked up to the finality of the performance at the time. Now I definitely feel it was something bigger he knew.

Singing about end-times in your twenties is cool and edgy. Bringing those same lyrics to his metaphorical death bed, hit totally different and it showed.

So cool he got to play out the final show, rip legend

MTG isn’t a sympathetic rogue, she’s a isolationist nationalist at her core. That is, any money leaving the country = bad. Just happens to align with palestinian interests on this specific topic.

Perhaps I’m not up to speed, but she was one of the first reps to call Israel’s actions a genocide. What gives?

deleted by creator

Behold, the pro-business small government party at work.

So I checked my history and you’re right, over the last 2 years the wildest swings I’ve had have been ±20, but I also haven’t spent wildly on the cards like I used to, not exceeding 50% utilized in this timeframe.

But I think a mortage being a secured loan probably reduces impact too.

(I’m not a banker or finance person, just someone who’s watched their score rollercoaster on apps in my less responsible youth lol)

Credit scores could end up being 20 or more points lower, according to financial experts

This, uh… doesn’t sound terribly impactful? My score fluctuates ±50 points just from regular credit utilization, idk what throwing 60k in student loans onto the report would do but - 20 points sounds very optimistic.

deleted by creator

I’m following what you’re getting at, it just feels the dev quoted makes “fiddling around” sound like an undertaking - users need to build custom lighting or change the engine in some way to get similar results. The real extent of fiddling in this case is dropping a node into a scene and making a few pointed selections.

Users preform this action a lot in godot. Everything rendered starts as a node, dropped into a scene, and making selections. Making a game would be “fiddling around” under this same context.

I believe the argument is that not every case needs or desires high fidelity realistic lighting. It is similar effort to take a godot game into a stylized, curated lighting direction, or take to a realistic direction. The trade off to Unreal’s approach is significantly more effort to “undo” the realistic lighting and then implement the stylized vision, if that’s what the game calls for.

But I do agree, there is value in defaults and it’d be nice to have a “make shit pretty” button that drops in preconfigured hyper real excellence.

“When you jump into something like Unreal, it assumes that you are making a photorealistic HD-looking game. So when you drop in some models, they already look great because of the lighting presets and so on,” explains Jay Baylis, co-director at Cassette Beasts maker Bytten Studio.

“But Godot doesn’t assume that, you need to fiddle around to make it look nice. As a result, people assume you can’t do 3D games in Godot. It does still lag behind; if you are making a AAA action game, you probably are better off using Unreal at this point in time, unless you really want to get into the weeds.”

This seems like a silly take, especially with all the lighting upgrades shipped in Godot 4. The tools are there, users just need to configure an environment node to suite the needs. I’d even argue Godot’s SDGFI is more robust than Unity’s Enlighten GI at this point.

While yeah unreal defaults are better for realistic light out of the box, ultimately if someone is making a AAA game they are getting “into the weeds” regardless of engine. I seriously doubt a AAA studio is going to ship a game with the default unreal lighting.