Hello, my name is Gloomy, from barleynews.wtf

Would you allow us to cite your comment in an upcoming article about the link between consumerism and a new AI driven trend, where an app takes random screenshots of you during your day and posts them to your social media account with AI enhanced captions fully automated?

One hurts a bit more and a bit longer.

Thanks for the context. Might have been caught up in the crossfire, but very worrying indeed.

Shit. Would you provide a source please?

That’s a sane take on a emotional matter. I agree.

We’ve had some success here with a program called “Don’t become a perpetrator”. Pedosexuals (which is the scientific term for people attracted to minors without acting upon their urges) could enter, as long as they hadn’t committed any crime in regards to children or consuming illegal content. They could get psychological help as well as a chemical castration. Preventive approaches like this should be more common.

🫥😬🥰

Thank you. It can be challenging as a lay person to filter out the clickbait aspects of these articles.

Yes! It feels like this being rather worthless without alternative media, as it makes up such a huge part of their news brainwashing.

Funny, isn’t it. All this time the left has yelled about those republicans who “only care about things when it affects them”.

Germany is doing okayish:

Source (PDF)

Holy fuck, you are right. This is from his Wikipedia page:

All the articles lead to just a handful of monks and a small group of their followers all of whom are military backed. It IS NOT wide-spread.

I can read and watch and understand what these militant monks have been saying and doing while you haven’t so your ASSUMPTION is again coming from absolute ignorance as are your arguments.

I’m not assuming, I’m going by the information that has been made avaible. Like here:

This violence has often been supported by factions within the Buddhist monastic community in Myanmar. Buddhist sermons regularly include Islamophobic messages such as unsubstantiated rumors of Muslim violence against Buddhists or Muslim plots to take over the country and destroy Buddhism. Thousands of monks have participated in anti-Muslim demonstrations, increasing interreligious tensions in the region. These elements of the Buddhist community have justified their actions using Buddhist theology, claiming that violence is acceptable if it is done in defense of their religion.

Regardless, there is no doubt that much of the Buddhist religious leadership of Myanmar has promoted violence against Muslims in the region.

https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/religion-context/case-studies/violence-peace/conflict-myanmar

I can read and watch and understand what these militant monks have been saying and doing while you haven’t so your ASSUMPTION is again coming from absolute ignorance as are your arguments.

This seems to directly contradict you.

As a side note, I find this part interesting:

The ethnic and religious violence in Myanmar is incredibly complex; the traumas of colonialism, poverty, the recent transition from a military government to a more democratic state, and the global war on terror all play major roles in shaping the conflict. However, the role of Buddhism in this conflict is clearly no less complex. While many monks in Myanmar seem to support and even advocate for violence against their Muslim neighbors, there are others who are constantly working to end the violence. Both believe their actions to be deeply inspired by Buddhism, and both use theology to justify their claims.

Maybe you will habe to just accept that there is no such thing as an easy truth here.

Listen, I understand your anger. I identify as a Buddhist and I am not happy to acknowledge that, in this case, the religion was at least used as an excuse for spreading violence.

Non the less, I don’t think talking around it is sensible. Sometimes we just have to face reality, even if it’s hard to swallow.

By your logic (if I understand you correctly, and by all means please correct me if not), something like the crusades could not be blamed on Christians. After all, they were politicaly motivated and the Pope only used the “Holy War” excuse to rally up troops.

I also don’t think it’s necessary to quote teachings in order to qualify the statement that “Buddhism was used to get people to commit a genocide”. Even if all they said was “we have to get rid of them, because they threaten our identity as Buddhists” that, in my opinion, is enoth to qualify the above statement.

And of course non of us knows of they quoted teachings. I assume you weren’t present, an I for sure was not. So they might have, or not have. Given the context of what happend it is at least a valid possibility.

Love the PS2 ones. They almost have a Goth vibe in their aesthetics.

You are right that I am not familiar with the detailed context and I thank you for adding it.

It remain an unfortunate truth, even after reading your post, that Buddhism has been used here as a weapon to spread hate. And even if it was only a minority of the population that fell for this hate, it remains true non the less that Lord Buddhas teachings have been used here in such a way.

So, even with this context, my main point stands: Every idea can and will be twisted in a hateful way by humans.

That’s not what OP is referring to.

Buddhist extremist monks have used hate speach in Myanmar for years to drive a genocide against the Rohingya, who they claim are a thread to the Buddhist identity of Myanmar.

Read about it here, for example.

I am a Buddhist myself, and I have to disagree with the “most peacefully religion ever” part. As the above example shows, every idea can be perverted and used for hate by humans.

Other examples against the idea of Buddhism beeing peaceful are Samurai beeing Buddhists, or that many people in Buddhist countries see disabled people as beeing at fault for their disabilities (the idea here is that the disability is the result of a karmic action in a past life).

Buddhism beeing overly peaceful is a misconception in the minority world (“the West”), possibly because it was introduced to Buddhism by New Age Hippies in the 70s, that worked it into the “Love and Peace” mindset that they already brought with them when encountering Buddhism.

I learned about Buddhism by one of the Lamas (Teachers) whon had encounter such Hippies and had been able to get enoth experience with “Westerners”, to be able to teach about the religion in a way that I could understand and connect from my point of view, while destroying the faulty concepts many of us have about Buddhism in the Minority World.

It’s true that all deaths on both sides were caused by people with JEWISH names. Coincidence? Not likley. Hitler killed less people. Elon is god. Sieg. Sieg!1!!!1

Grok, probably

The stabbing thing happened after he died.

Romans would brake the legs of crucified victims to check if they were still alive. In Jesus case they instead pocked him with a spear.

The person that wrote this part of the gospel (as in, very likley, made it up), had to write this in because they needed to keep the story of Jesus in line with old testament prophecies about the Messias, one of which speaks of said Messias beeing “unbroken”. So they came up with an alternative to the leg braking.

It’s one of several examples where gospel writers tried to write things into the gospel that made it look like Jesus was the Messias by inventing events about him that made his life line up with existing prophecies about the jewish messiah.

In Germany it’s 30 days a year, excluding weekends. So a total of 6 weeks. At least in my field of work.

You’re right. This survey lists 29 % of Americans as “Religiously unaffiliated”. Of those 5 % are Atheists, 6 % Agnostic and 19 % “Nothing in particular”.