Wtf, does you friend work a physical labour job or something?!

Hmm, couldn’t find community error. Is ani.social defederated from feddit.org?

That’s RIGHT, one flintlock in my hand, and two chest belts each with 13 more flintlocks. AS THE FOUNDING FATHERS INTENDED!

Wrong, advocate for pro-consumer laws. Today it’s a switch, tomorrow its a thing you use. And on that post there will be another snide comment on how idiot customers didn’t read the 50 page EULA.

Weren’t the allies putting off Hitler assassinations due to fear of him being replaced by someone more competent?

Behold, an intellectual cuck.

People will do business with them if it’s profitable, morality plays no role here.

Also learning an instrument!

You can do that more efficiently by using abs(number).

The great filter ended up being more mundane than anyone imagined.

Since I live in the EU, I’m more concerned with what the EU does with my data than China.

Politicians harp on data protection when it comes to China, but are more than willing to support ChatControl and de-anonymization of users on the internet in the name of “protecting children”.

*It was nice not knowing you guys.

I posted on the Arch forums ONCE. Didn’t get a single reply, lol. Actually had to open an issue on the upstream git repo to get any info.

Flirt? Nah, thats pure creep behavior.

eh

Bronze knives cant cut bone ribs.

For any skill, no matter which, the more theory you know the more accelerated your learning rate will be. But it doesn’t inherently teach you a skill.

having knowledge =\= learned skill

having knowledge -> increased perception of mistakes/inaccuracies while learning -> more rapid rate of mistake/inaccuracy correction == accelerated learning rate

In a way you could say that theoretical knowledge is equivalent to having talent in terms of what effect it has.

This is why you have a shell company JUST for your employees that need to use Oracle.

Threat that comes from pointing a gun at someone mostly comes from the body language and the facial expression of the shooter, knowing what a gun does empowers the threat, it doesn’t truly create it on its own.

Someone who doesn’t know what a gun is could definitely infer that it is a weapon, and that they are within its effective range. All that JUST from the body language of the shooter.

Wait, even if it fat doesn’t rot it still doesn’t integrate into tissue at the site of injection, right? It’s just loose fat tissue pâté that adds volume with no structure?