- 144 Posts
- 16 Comments
Please bro, trust me bro, just a few more [dozen] billion. AGI is just around the corner bro
It’s being sold as something each country can spin up and generate wealth from otherwise no longer wealth generating land.
It is even worse then that as that is some of the most productive farmland in the world.
Exactly.
“ethical regurgitative (what the morons call generative) ai”
I love that term, it is incredibly apt.
The always relevant: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381278855_ChatGPT_is_bullshit
Look at the mountains in the AI slop.
Exactly, except the company is Facebook fucking up the advertisements.
Also, art source (Bluesky)
It is a link to an academic journal.
Consequently, this study suggests that using the term “Artificial Intelligence” in marketing campaigns and product descriptions may negatively impact consumer demand.
Here is a video of a disabled artist drawing with their mouth: https://www.instagram.com/g.darkins/p/DCPqpuihYCz/?img_index=1
Final Result:
Please do not insult disabled artists like that.
Another thread:
The way I can tell is through nonsensical lighting and/or composition, while it is not foolproof it is still fairly reliable.
How to you fix the problem, then? Anyone can set up an image generator on almost any computer. The generation methods are just applied mathmatics.
I don’t know.
We have opened Pandora’s Box on AI and now the internet is forever massively worsened because of it. My only hope is that AI never advances past anything beyond the basics of composition so that it remains easy to spot and therefore easy to restrict from spaces celebrating real art.
AI is a tool, like a paint brush. You can create masterpieces as well as stick-figure drawings depending on how you use it.
Ah yes, because when humans do art we never add little touches that make it our own even if we are closely following the source material. Meanwhile AI only closely follows its data
Take for example this redraw of this meme:
Vs the original:
While they appear similar you can clearly see where they differ, with the end result being much better vs if they had copied the original more faithfully. Those changes were all intentionally done, based on the artists experiences biases and even mood. When AI makes changes it does not have the same intentions because it does not have artistic intent.
Art is a foundational way of human communication. AI slop is not that, as it mimics art while losing out on all but the most superficial of its communication.
I wish.
Here’s the source: https://marketoonist.com/2023/03/ai-written-ai-read.html