It was already shown that SteamOS is way better in terms of battery performance than Windows. So if Windows uses power saving mode by default, these results are even more damning:

There might be some tweaks to mitigate some of the short comings of Windows, but that doesn’t changed that the script has flipped. Before it was Linux that required tweaking and Windows would have a decent out of the box experience. Now SteamOS works great out of the Box while Windows needs tweaks. And at that point there is no reason for sticking with Windows unless your software specifically demands it.

Yes, because just because you bought a book you don’t own its content. You’re not allowed to print and/or sell additional copies or publicly post the entire text. Generally it’s difficult to say where the limit is of what’s allowed. Citing a single sentence in a public posting is most likely fine, citing an entire paragraph is probably fine, too, but an entire chapter would probably be pushing it too far. And when in doubt a judge must decide how far you can go before infringing copyright. There are good arguments to be made that just buying a book doesn’t grant the right to train commercial AI models with it.

My best guess is Russia tries to make their death toll appear as small as possible. If they take the bodies back, those soldiers are confirmed dead but if they don’t take them back, they can pretend, for some time at least, that those soldiers are MiA or PoWs.

Interesting writeup, but in my opinion far to complicate. LLMs fail on way simpler reasoning tasks like playing games of 20 questions. And it’s not just that they fail to guess the character, they are plain stupid in playing the game, repeating questions or asking redundant questions like negatives of previous questions.

That’s one of the fundamental strategies from the trump playbook: just claim the people want something and if it’s repeated loud and often enough, people will start to believe it. Hopefully not for something as egregious as this, but it has worked in the past.

See, it’s fine when he goes golfing as he doesn’t directly contribute anything to his or his pals’ wealth. But those workers actually creating wealth, how dare they take days off.

It might be correct in a technical sense but it’s first and foremost misleading. If something costs $150 and the seller offers for the price to come down 50%, you’d rightfully expect the price to be $75, not $100. The seller could argue that it’s some 50% markup being removed but would you believe that to be a genuine explanation, or that the seller is trying to mislead or scam you?