Awww

Hehe

I wonder when we’re gonna start calling the Streisand effect the Trump effect

Clearly, you’re not a republican

Don’t forget, rapist and traitor!

It’s never too late to study something new!

Your statement struck me as strange and somewhat ironic because paleontology involves a lot of digging deep to find fossils. And while I obviously can’t disagree with you on the fact that a lot of organisms did die without getting fossilized, I disagree that paleontology is just “scratching the surface“. Certainly, not everything can be revealed via paleontology for the obvious reasons, but it has revealed an awful lot.

Paleontology studies this. Perhaps you should study paleontology?

Yes, he’s a very serious about

STOP ASKING ABOUT EPSTEIN!!!

And to the point, Democrats need to stop trying to convert Maga voters. They need to focus on the non-voters who are disillusioned with a system that doesn’t serve them. And what do they have to do? Just like Mamdani is doing: do what the people want. They’ll shower are you with votes and money.

Hold onto your butts

Those quotation marks are unnecessary. This is hardly unusual behavior for a Christian.

I’ve never met a Christian, who actually embodied Christian values. Every one of them, especially the more religious of them, is a lying bigoted hypocrite, who only gives a shit about themselves and their own family. Maybe I’ve met the wrong kind of Christians, but there it is.

I have, however, met a great deal of atheists, who, in fact, do embody what Christians proselytize as their values. Kindness, acceptance, understanding, a duty to help others… in my life, the worst people I’ve ever met were strongly religious. And the best people I’ve ever met were atheists.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The mass majority of their “pay” comes from grifts, donors, and other corruption outside of their official salary from the Congress.

Oh, you still had any doubt whatsoever? How cute.

VPN do do do do do do

[nearly-supernatural level of eyeroll]

Hardly surprising

In a pluralistic society, individuals are rarely responsible for any measure of “change“. While we may venerate- and even idolize - such memorable figures in our history, and rightly so, the vast majority of change is both slow and takes place because of the concerted effort of a large amount of people who don’t really take any credit for it.

So, while your statement is, technically, correct, it doesn’t account for how such things typically come to pass. In other words, what you said makes sense logically, but practically, that logic plays a very small role in the reality of the situation because most people act illogically.

I like how, instead of a DeLorean, it’s a Cybertruck with gullwing doors.

Not only do I not mind, I would hope that my perspective partner would have enough sexual experience so that we would both enjoy ourselves.