I mean, keep in mind that these volcanos can and do periodically errupt on a much more minor scale, many of these signs are much more likely to point to that. They’re still active, but the vast majority of activity is going to be minor rather than lead to a supervolcano scale eruption.
That’s the odds OP asked for, so I phrased it that way. Sorry it is a little confusing.
This professor of volcanology places the odds at 1/1400, despite highlighting several trends towards quickly filling magma reservoirs. It seems there’s just a lot of space to fill.
PBS Eons
Yep, this is the thing people often forget about gerrymandering. The entire point is to take a large margin of victory in an area, and use it to offset your opponents margin in another area, usually by carving into your opponents margin with several of your own.
The more gerrymandered a set of districts is, the more likely they are to be tipped by an unexpected change of turn out by a given group.
One group gets complacent (my vote doesn’t matter in this state, since my party always wins!) or one group gets fired up… And suddenly the story flips.
So very agreed.
You can’t help people who don’t want help. And a large portion of the South not only doesn’t want help, but inflicts harm on the rest of the US. It’s fixable but not near term.
I’m not sure it accounts for everything, but people tend to embrace conservatism (and yes, eventually Authoritarianism) due to fear. I was very young during the HIV/AIDS scare, but the fear was rampant and very real.
Magic Johnson making his diagnosis public and Princess Diana touching someone with AIDS was international headline news.
People are dumb and fear makes us less empathetic and even dumber.
This is correct for a given transaction, but there’s no consensus needed to open a Bitcoin wallet. That is usually just a private key in an encrypted envelope.
Alabama’s state slogan is “Thank God for Mississippi”, because they can at least point to one place where things are worse.
It’s a real parameter.
The Polynesian people had many ways of detecting land far beyond the horizon using ocean currents, temperatures, weather patterns, animal movements, and others which they used to island hop all the way through the Pacific Islands.
I have little doubt it was a well informed theory before they got into their vessels.
I bought cheap tri-ply stainless steel set and a couple carbon steel pans from
https://www.webstaurantstore.com/
For less than $300 for the whole set.
If it’s good enough for a professional kitchen it’s more than enough for the rest of us.
Edit: This was 4 years ago and everything is still in great shape and is used constantly. The stainless is as good as any tri-ply. Vigor stainless steel and Vollrath carbon steel. Can’t go wrong at the price really.
The life and times of a software developer.
I’m going for Mussolini.
Gondor calls for aid
Mostly undoing his legacy and trying to placate their base, who is sharply divided in the actions of Trump/GOP since the election.
I apologize for the double reply, truly. Didn’t want to add a huge amount of text in an edit since I figured you’d reply quickly.
I’ll summarize my rebuttal thusly, and you can decide for yourself if you want to continue.
I think we’re arguing over the definition of species using two separate definitions. Encyclopedia Brittannica indicates that genetic species is a distinct definition from the definition of biological species.
Is it fair to say that genetically these homonids are extremely closely related, but had distinct populations with distinct traits and morphology over time and across large geographies due to adaptive pressure?
So then the debate centers on when or if speciation occured with each of those definitions, which I don’t think is a really productive exercise. We’re basically saying the same things just differently.
And apologies, I did you a disservice by not replying to your single citation.
At the top of the definition:
however. Some examples include the ecological species concept, which describes a species as a group of organisms framed by the resources they depend on (in other words, their ecological niche), and the genetic species concept, which considers all organisms capable of inheriting traits from one another within a common gene pool and the amount of genetic difference between populations of that species.
The definition of genetic species are distinct due to more than just “can they successfully interbreed”. It’s more about their genetic drift and timeline.
Your own text extraction says things like “usually” and “almost always”, because we have distinct examples of this happening over and over.
Like most of science and nature it’s messy and categories are imperfect, but we use what we got to do the science we can.
OH now I see, just another attempt by the feeble Republicans in Minnesota who haven’t had power in decades to embarrass themselves by trying to steal headlines.