• 3 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 13th, 2025

help-circle
  • I didn’t say that victims can’t be abusers, nor did I say that he was a hero.

    People who’ve done harm need to be prevented from causing further harm, but it’s important to acknowledge the root cause of their behavior if you want to stop future iterations.

    I think that the OP is entirely a joke, but that it comes from the very real villain of systemic injustice that pressures us all to lash out. I think one could see the film as inspirational insofar as being inspired to take violent action, but I would hope they direct their aggression towards worthy targets.






  • stray@pawb.socialto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneCaterpillars for mouths rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    As an animated work, Steven Universe is kind of garbage. There are YouTube essays out there detailing its problems, but it’s most glaring when a guest animator takes over a small portion of the series and blows the entire thing out of the water.

    The OP is disingenuous, but animation is having a problem these days with restricted budgets, homogenized designs, and poor use of digital tools. Quality animation was always expensive and therefore in the minority, but the everyday budget stuff is worse than in the past. There are recent series that I can’t even watch due to awful framerates and bad CGI.



  • I don’t think whether an attack is physically violent should play a role in whether someone is allowed to use violence to defend themselves. Plenty of forms of sexual assault are non-violent in the sense that they don’t cause bodily harm to the victim, but I still think you should be allowed to resort to violent methods of stopping/preventing them. Things like gropings, upskirt photography, etc are a form of psychological violence in my opinion.

    This is different from break-ins which are a more serious crime as they violate the private living spaces of people on top of violating their property rights.

    What is the reasoning behind this distinction? Are you suggesting it’s okay to defend your home with violence?

    To come at this from another angle, do you think theft should be legal? If not, why is it okay for the state to enact violence on perpetrators, but not victims?


  • I don’t agree with characterizing being robbed from as not a big deal, especially when it’s as physically intimate as pickpocketing.

    Maybe it’s no big deal to lose a bit of money if you’re rich, but I would be truly fucked to lose my phone or wallet, and more than inconvenienced to lose money or objects which would need to be replaced with money.

    But more than that is the sense of violation. What gives someone the right to come into my home or put hands on my body and take my personal things? It’s dehumanizing. It feels disgusting to be treated that way. Of course I’m going to defend myself.



  • stray@pawb.socialtoADHD memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comTaxed indeed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    It’s fine if people come in to learn about it though, right? I think a lot of people like myself can’t get diagnosed for various reasons, or maybe they just have a loved one who has ADHD. I think it’s better to say that if you’re going to be ableist about it, you can keep your mouth shut.









  • stray@pawb.socialtoADHD memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comSo many moods
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    28 days ago

    Pretty much every mental diagnosis that exists is a case of something completely normal which presents in too extreme (or too muted) a fashion in the given individual. The criteria for diagnosis isn’t just whether you experience X, but whether X has a significant negative impact on your life.