- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
thericofactor@sh.itjust.worksto politics @lemmy.world•Fetterman Breaks Ranks From Dems, Praises Trump Over Iran Attack65·3 days agoCan’t he be impeached or something based on mental issues?
thericofactor@sh.itjust.worksto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What are some slow paced and minimal plot movies?2·5 days agoKudos for mentioning Lost in Translation. One if my favorite movies. Whenever I try to explain to people what it’s about, I get blank looks why that would be entertaining.
thericofactor@sh.itjust.worksto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Advice on moving my Spotify library to NavidromeEnglish1·16 days agoIf artists would actually get paid fairly by Spotify that would be a good model.
Until about 100 years ago music artists would get paid for playing live only. Then music reproduction became possible, and lo and behold, companies started making a profit off of popular musicians by reproducing their music and taking a share, just because they could afford the technology.
Then, reproduction came into the hands of regular people, and you could reproduce music at home, bypassing the companies that profit off of the musicians. So copyright laws were drafted to protect mostly the companies making a profit off of musicians.
Now we’re going back to the situation of 100 years ago: musicians need to play live to get paid. But reproduction does still make them famous without them having to travel. So that’s a plus.
And you can argue Spotify has to.pay for infrastructure and app development, but that technology is in the hands of individuals as well nowadays. So what do they actually offer, on top of the work of creative people making music? Not much. Yet they become more expensive every year. And the only people getting richer are their shareholders.
His wife has a boyfriend and they have a kid?