• Scratch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was not super enamoured with 1. But most of my complaints were from features that just needed more time to cook.

    Really hope they get addressed in 2. Would be an incredible game if so.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The story in 1 was also weak. When you’ve got shit like Disco Elysium out there, the pandering “ooh capitalism is big bad” while also not giving it a serious critique falls pretty flat.

      The trailer for 2 even jokes about how its “by capitalism.”

      • Incblob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        While I agree with you, it’s a bit unfair to compare the two.

        DE is “just” a point and click pushed to an absurd level of quality, meaning that most of the production can go into managing a story.

        OW is an fps, meaning you need a gameplay loop, weapons, balancing, environments, etc etc. It’s also a dark satire, not a serious philosophical work like elysium. Reading 10 pages of text on the nature of violence before you get to shoot your gun would not work.

        This doesn’t excuse a weak story, but does explain how it’s much more difficult and costly to fit one in there. (yes bioshock, but those games are the exception in fps games).

        I would love a better story, with a tightly integrated story, that would be very difficult to pull off in the current game dev space at this scale.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m a Spacer’s Choice man, myself. Everything else is just trustworthy and reliable.