• FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      01·
      2 months ago

      Wow, the anti-AI zealots can tell exactly what diffusion models the OP was using.

      Truly an inspirational group of neo-luddites.

      • BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
        1·
        2 months ago

        You’re licking the boots of a company that uses the work of others without compensation or credit then sells it back to you at a premium. This is the exact behavior the GPL license aimed to prevent. I have nothing against the technology if it’s made with permission and benefits the people it depends on, but that’s clearly not the case here.

        Ludites are an apt comparison. The Luddites fought to protect their industry from industrialists who aimed to replace them with cheap, low skilled and child labour. The goal of AI isn’t advancement it’s replacement, and most of the companies pushing it are transparent about that.

      • Drew@sopuli.xyz
        1·
        2 months ago

        you know the luddites were only standing up for their rights, they didn’t hate technology

  • Ignotum@lemmy.world
    1·
    2 months ago

    If you look closely at his shirt, and what he said, you’d know he compiled his own OS before breakfast

    • Little8Lost@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      2 days ago

      Earlier i made a bad 5 minute ms paint draving:
      has an 85+% while the original had about 66% (before it was taken down because it broke a no ai rule)
      So at least in that metric doing some low effort painting, even while pointing out its copied content, has way better metrics

      so yea: dont do it with ai slop

      op is probably also loosing some time on us commenters disliking the slop that could have been invested into a scetch on paper

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        1·
        2 months ago

        This is the n-th cartoon of this bland style.

        • The redundant shirt and speech bubble
        • the lack of a proper punchline
        • weird smile on the right dude
        • fingers
      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        1·
        2 months ago

        This same style is popping up everywhere.

        Look for style consistency, including lettering, colors, line thicknesses, character features (e.g. number of fingers, shapes of facial features)

      • SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.eeEnglish
        0·
        2 months ago

        There’s no attribution as well. No artist does that.

        Unless it’s stolen, but again, the art style is very current AIesque.

        • Little8Lost@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          2 days ago

          I dont use attribution normally but at some level of quality there should be one.

          But its definetly a very good indicator to take a closer look when there is no attribution or it “looks woird”

        • gon [he]@lemm.eeEnglish
          1·
          2 months ago

          IDK if it’s AI or not, but it does look it.

          There’s just a certain smoothness to the art you usually don’t find in human art. The crop is weird, the keys don’t make sense…

          It might be human, I don’t know for sure, but it looks very AI.