• ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      The wording seems to be that repairs must start within 48 hours, which is reasonable. Landlords could likely successfully argue that ordering replacement parts or having a someone scheduled to come out counts as starting or commencement.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        If it’s power or water at any time of the year, 2 days is frankly extremely generous.

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Michigan has colder winters. What if your heat goes out? Two days is too long in this scenario, especially for elderly or young kids.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Yeah some work requiring contractors can take days to even find someone who can fit you into their schedule. 2 days seems great for critical to life things like no heat/ac, no functioning water/sewer, etc. But like, roof damage, a broken window? shit like that? Larger jobs It’ll take at least a week to get a crew scheduled to even show up, and seems like an unreasonable legal burden.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        48 hours is plenty of notice to find somebody to tarp a hole in a roof or board up a broken window.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Depends on the action needed.

      Personally, I feel like for health and safety items, after 48 hours the renter should be able to call someone to do the repair on their behalf and bill the landlord any reasonable fees / withhold that money from the next month’s rent.