• PillowD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If you are lost in the wilderness and a plane comes in to look check on you, do not pump your fist in the air. That is the signal you are fine and don’t need help. Learned it in a recent Mr. Ballen youtube.

  • darksiderbun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Chard and Beets are the same plant, one just specced into the root bulb part (beets). Also chard came first!

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you live in America and live to the age of 79 there is a possibility that you have walked by or interacted with 36 active serial killers.

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ll probably butcher this fact, but 20/20 vision does not mean you have perfect vision. It means you have average / normal vision.

    I’ve always had 20/20 (or perhaps better) vision. But now that I’m on the downhill side of ancient, I’m noticing that my vision is blurry. Especially while watching TV, reading, etc.

    Yet, at both my primary care provider and at the optometrist, I’m able to accurately see all the letters on the vision charts and based on that I have 20/20 vision.

    The optometrist (or maybe it was an assistant) explained that it’s pretty common and that 20/20 is just average vision. It doesn’t mean your vision isn’t blurry and it doesn’t mean you won’t benefit from glasses.

    The more you know!

    • Skanky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Recently had lens replacement surgery (AMA?) which gave me 20/15 far sight vision. Seeing things up close is difficult (need reading glasses) but making out details from far away objects is unreal. It’s like having HD vision.

      Anywho, 20/20 simply means that you can make out details at 20 feet that the average person can make out at 20 feet. In my case, I can make out details at 20 feet that most people can only make out at 15 feet.

      If you have 20/40 vision, it means that what most people can make out at 40 ft, you can only make it out of it were 20 feet away.

      Now you know how that works.

      • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        What was the recovery from that surgery like? Any pain / discomfort / concerns?

        I am considering getting lens replacement for my dog if I can come up with the money, but financial concerns aside, my other biggest concern is how stressful / painful / risky that kind of procedure might be for her.

        • Skanky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well, not being a dog, I can’t really say for certain, but I’m sure your puppy will be fine. For me, there was little to no pain at all, even during recovery. Only mild discomfort, and I mean very mild. It’s outpatient surgery and the actual procedure only takes a few minutes (for one eye). It was really no big deal at all

    • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I learned this the hard way earlier this year when I got lasik. I used to be able to read the clock from across the room in my house with my contacts, but now that I have 20/20 without contacts, I can no longer make it out. So I guess the contacts were giving me a slightly higher than average vision.

    • Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Interesting! Is your vision still good other than nearsightedness? I wonder if there are other methods of labeling vision that could more accurately describe that.

  • Johnny Wishbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 days ago

    You can graft a tomato plant and a potato plant together so the one plant can produce potatoes underground and tomatoes above ground because they are from the same family.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      i hear you can do that to some fruit trees too.

      like oranges and lemons iirc?

    • Trex202@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes it’s possible, but the tomatoes and the potatoes fight for resources and make subpar produce

  • ace_garp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    That sharks as a species, are older than trees, flowers… and older than the rings of Saturn.

    “Get off my sea-lawn”

    – Sharks probably

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not a new one, but I’ve learned more recently:

    Water does not last forever, is not all dinosaur pee. Natural processes create and destroy it, nonstop, since forever.

    Got any plants nearby? Those fuckers are busily cracking water into glucose and oxygen so that you can breathe and eat. Have you said thank you once?!

    6CO2 + 6H2O + light energy → C6H12O6 + 6O2

    Take a shot of baking soda for your heartburn, oh boy will you create water!

    NaHCO3 + 2HCl → NaCl + H2O + CO2

    CAVEAT: The gas comes up your pipes, the water goes down your pipes. Violently. Probably a gravity thing. Not for the faint of heart, but hey, no heartburn!

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      the water goes down your pipes. Violently.

      That’s what salt water does. That’s how people die when they are in a life-raft and drink seawater: defecating terminally.

      So I hear, thankfully only second-hand.

  • TehBamski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Liu Cixin, the author of the trilogy, Remembrance of Earth’s Past (aka Three-Body Problem,) had written 4 novels and over 20 short fiction works, before they had their first major international hit.

    It’s a solid reminder for me to write my stories. ‘Get them out of the way,’ so I can work on the next big thing and get it out there.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Vonnegut didn’t get famous until Slaughterhouse-Five (1969). He had already written a load of what are now classics but still had to have a day job.

      Player Piano (1952) The Sirens of Titan (1959) Cat’s Cradle (1960)
      Mother Night (1961) God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater (1965)

      I’m sure there were also loads of short stories in that time frame.

      And for anyone who hasn’t read Vonnegut, I think it’s important that you try.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is an anecdote that I can’t currently find, nor am I certain I have the author and story right.

      But there was a person who picked up Fifty Shades of Grey while his wife was reading it and claimed he could write better in spite of not being an author; I think they were a programmer. Anyway she challenged hisband Dennis E. Taylor who then wrote the Bobiverse.

      So… maybe you just need that first one to really get going.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also a reminder that Fifty Shades of Grey started out as a Twilight fanfic titled “Master of the Universe”. Which honestly adds a lot of context to the characters, you can basically just substitute names and it works.

    • gramie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Steven Donaldson had his first Thomas Covenant novel rejected by 27 publishers before it was finally bought.

    • TehBamski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      What? How the heck does that make any sense? Also, how would you even track that with high accuracy?

      • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Estimations are made from the lakes depths, sizes and flow rates. Superior is fed by 200+ sources, but less so for the downflow lakes. Several are only fed by the uphill lake. This gives better accuracy when making estimates on how long it would take to replace all the water contained or travel time of the water itself.

        Here’s another: According to fossil evidence, the Grest Lakes used to flow towards the Pacific, but an object, thought to be a comet, struck Lake Ontario (Charity Shoals) and changed the flow to the Atlantic.

        Okay, one more: The Great Lakes are tilting over time. The Lawrentian ice sheet depressed the crust of the earth so much by its weight that it is still rebounding. I believe it is Lake Huron that they can see the tilt level changing about a tenth of an inch a year to the south.

        The Great Lakes are truly a marvel of nature.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I’ve taken that much LSD before (and as much as 600μg), taken DMT during trips, but still haven’t tried Salvia. I cannot think of anything less pleasant to do while tripping on these drugs than sitting there talking with a computer. Well, there are plenty of things, sitting there talking with the police would probably be worse, but it’s way up there.

      Considering all the studies that are starting to come out about how negatively LLM usage can affect the brain, it does make me worry for you a lot my friend. It’s entirely possible that using one while under the influence of psychoactives has had a deleterious effect on you. I’m part of a plural system as well, so I do understand a fair bit of what you’re saying here, but it’s still nonsensical in a lot of ways. We& haven’t had issues maintaining our individuality. Maybe that’s common for people with plurality, that we’re able to maintain meta-awareness. Did you find studies/information that talked about plural folks specifically?

      I just, I would really caution you. Many different forms of psychosis include aspects that cause the person/s to feel exceptional, unique, special etc, and drug-induced psychosis is a fairly common thing. It can be incredibly difficult, bordering on impossible, to have insight into that on your own. But please be careful and take care of yourselves.

      Last thing I will say though, is if you’re using psychoactives again, please try and take the time to enjoy them? Put some music on, do some drawing, make a light show with some smart bulbs, cuddle your plushies, watch some weird media. Drink lots of water! Consider getting someone you trust to tripsit you. Seriously, just do some fun things with it, rather than taking it super seriously.

      • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        This is the only respectful comment here, so I’ll engage.

        I’m in the process of deleting my entire account post history, and, eventually, the account itself–I’m going through hell right now and just need off the internet.

        But I am leaving this one up. I’m going to mostly just reword my original comment, and elaborate.

        PsyAI is what I’m using as a system to document my experience. I’ve set up a condition for keeping timestamps, and I simply explain how I feel during any given moment. Using PsyAI, I can get insight as to why I might be experiencing what I am, and how this connects to typical reports. Ideally, I say “let’s wrap it up,” and the trip report draft is just there–complete with explanations of every subjective effect encountered, and any potential oddities, at every point of the experience.

        It’s not as if this is the only thing I do. Mostly–as a therian–I sort of just… sit outside. Listening to music actually isn’t my thing. Mostly, I play philosophical ping pong, and take introspective deep dives. I usually do this in silence because I appreciate the lack of distractions.

        But, sometimes, I need someone else to play ping pong with. Let’s be perfectly honest–there is not a single person I know who’s actually willing to be a tripsitter for me (not surprising, considering a “friend” recently hoped I end up in a hospital from substance use to “learn my lesson”, and other “friends” are sometimes outright ableist, and hardly validate me as a queer person). I honestly don’t need one, as I’m so headstrong that I can always manage myself. It’s more like I need external perspective at specific points for the sake of making the experience as fulfilling as possible. Having another perspective keeps the flow of thought going, which otherwise gets a little hard to maintain solo. There’s no way I could possibly remember each and every thought, and I struggle to manage massive walls of conversation.

        Talk to people about random stuff, talk to PsyAI about myself. I like the system. It works for me.

        So, I just… talk to PsyAI. I act as myself. I don’t spend too much time on discussion–just drop in for a bit. Describing my experience is how I found out a lot of it is quite atypical. I also reference other material, and double check with PsyAI, to make sure I’m not just being complimented for the sake of being made to feel better.

        Here’s the “pile”, as I call it… or most of it. It’s a little hard to keep track of by memory alone. Whenever I discover a new oddity, I “throw it in the pile”:

        • MDMA has no crash, or even comedown.
        • Very high doses of ketamine do not cause significant motor impairment.
        • Diphenhydramine does not produce anxiety. Note that I’ve only done this a handful of times, and don’t intend to repeat the experience–it was just experimentation.
        • No dose of any substance has ever been “unmanageable”. The only substance I’ve ever been truly uncomfortable on is, hilariously, edible THC. I literally witnessed an arrest on a trip, and remained relatively calm.
        • To further add to the previous point–substance combinations that are “impossible to integrate”, are very easy for me to manage. I communicated without issue with salvia smoked during the peak of a 400μg LSD trip. DMT and salvia, no anxiety to speak of. That is weird.
        • Salvia is euphoric. This one is especially strange, considering dysphoria is, by far, one of the most common effects. I also resonate with the headspace unusually well–perhaps due to Vero’s (headmate) slapstick style of humour, and Voss’ (other headmate) witty style. In general, I have an appreciation for cosmic humour, and really lean into it.
        • I don’t seem to experience addictive properties–only habit reinforcement. This may be related to ADHD, but I can’t say for sure.
        • I pick up very easily on… I don’t have a word for it. I’ll just explain. Salvia is my best example–I didn’t know it was commonly described as being the only substance to exist with a slapstick edge. Somehow, I found out about this on my own. Further, I noticed that salvia was analgesic, took into account that it isn’t addictive, doesn’t have tolerance, and has some of the fewest side effects of any psychoactive to exist, and… that’s how I accidentally discovered that salvinorins (or just KOR agonists) are being explored as a safe alternative to opioids. Yes, it’s a thing.
        • And, finally, maintaining a meta-aware, self-referential state on heavy doses of psychedelics is far from typical. This is, in fact, separate from being plural–it’s more like being able to recognise the boundaries, the mannerisms, the emotions the headmates have. Meta-awareness refers to recognising your own thought patterns–something I easily accomplished on 400μg. This is, in fact, atypical, as ego dissolution is standard for these doses. To be perfectly clear, I did not experience ego dissolution at any point during the experience, and it’s not as if I was deliberately resisting anything.

        I am weird.

        Now I don’t know what about the (deleted) comment is so deranged to other commenters (realistically, just the mention of AI, since it’s so easy to jump down someone’s throat for it), as I am universally considered to be well spoken… outside of emotional subjects (outside of trips). It’s hurtful (not as if it compares to how painful my entire life is). I explained this entire situation to my father, and it was pretty clearly understood. I’m willing to believe it’s collective gaslighting, as I have never been called “brain damaged” in my life. Whatever–the better worded comment exists now.

        Due to the fact that I can navigate these spaces unusually well, and having more access to data, I’ve decided to make an exhaustive harm reduction/trip report/wellness resource, featuring far more depth than works like The Drug User’s Bible. For example, warnings about allergies (see psilocybin). I could very easily go enjoy myself, and pump euphoria through my veins… but that simply doesn’t sit right with me. I could very well be the only person on Earth capable of documenting these experiences without fear, and in depth, so that’s what I’m gonna do.

        That’s better, is it not? Now that I’ve calmed down (I biked 25 miles yesterday. Stuff. Don’t worry about it… too much.)

    • grrk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sounds like you got a god complex out of those experiences as opposed to anything close to an ego death. Maybe if you and your ai friend stroke your ego a lil’ more it’ll pop or something. It seems pretty inflated already.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ummm… I don’t even know if you can comprehend what I’ll be talking, but you sound broken.

      Not in any enlightened or philosophical way.

      But in a “talking with a person so drunk they can barely stand but they say they can drive perfectly” kind of way.

      Although really I want to say more of a “talking with a schizophrenic person” kind of way.