It’s all about security guarantees, not the land. The point is to agree on security guarantees and it’s very very unlikely this will be NATO. This has been said so many times now, it makes no difference is Trump it anyone repeates it once again.
We need comprehensive security guarantees on the table worked out in detail. Let’s say a similar agreements as NATO with the US and EU and with European forces at the border for 50 years. The proposal itself would bear weight and could be the main taking point as the war continues and hopefully freezes as soon as possible with the agreement in place.
Thats the main thing. Ukraine can give up land, as long it’s not the big cities which serve as a defense line.
That is by far the best agreement Russia can get without this getting totally out of hand.
Finally a bit more thoughtfulness in an article.
It’s all about security guarantees, not the land. The point is to agree on security guarantees and it’s very very unlikely this will be NATO. This has been said so many times now, it makes no difference is Trump it anyone repeates it once again.
We need comprehensive security guarantees on the table worked out in detail. Let’s say a similar agreements as NATO with the US and EU and with European forces at the border for 50 years. The proposal itself would bear weight and could be the main taking point as the war continues and hopefully freezes as soon as possible with the agreement in place.
Thats the main thing. Ukraine can give up land, as long it’s not the big cities which serve as a defense line.
That is by far the best agreement Russia can get without this getting totally out of hand.
It’s supposedly NATO that’s guaranteeing Ukraine then, but I bet the USA is gonna withdraw afterward and leave the EU alone
They will accelerate the war profiteering, without a doubt. Still better than not selling the weapons at all, which could also happen.