why did he give Ukraine a bunch of Starlink receivers
Because those receivers were “free” for the Ukrainians but someone else paid millions for that
Imagine paying $500/month for each “free” receiver because “military applications needs maximum quality” but when the vatnik CEO gets a call from its owner "oh no today it glitched!”
It depends, maybe they like the contents of some instances like this one
Although on some blocks I can’t disagree:
It’s what pisses me off the most using Debian.
Set a active directory server with samba on Debian and one day windows 11 machines couldn’t login anymore.
After hours of troubleshooting:
ah yes this samba issue was fixed 3 years ago but you didn’t get it because you’re “stable”
“suspend” is Microsoft corpo speak to say “turn off the screen and fans and use 100% of the CPU to install updates, user expects to have its battery depleted when he comes back”
They’re not gay! They just happen to have SSA (Same sex attraction)
/s
Bonus content:
Wake up baby, deepseek today is uncensored
He gets the papers already ready to sign, I can’t imagine him writing bills.
At most he can choose the name of the bill, as shown by the latest one, it’s so obvious that even stupid algorithms can guess it
No he means only to who donated at least $1 mil to his inauguration
Regular people will still be fucked if they torrent a single ebook
Checking, downloading and installing irmware updates is the only thing that works on a banned console. Of course they are not allowing it because they’re nice, just because they want to close eventual exploits
Your comment, paraphrased:
Nintendo is Nintendo and they can never be wrong, I will defend them and ask for proof. Then deny any proof given.
You asked proof of a brick, I showed you proof of a brick.
Ah yes, sorry, it’s not a brick. Because it turns on and, because it doesn’t even show the icon of those legitimately purchased games that are unwrapped in front of the camera, you can go to settings, then you can, uh, toggle between dark mode and light mode. Yes, totally not a brick. People pay $450 for a game console not for playing games, just to stare at the empty screen.
If a device has a single purpose, which is playing games, and it can’t play such game, how it’s not a brick?
“It’s not a brick, it’s just a paperweight!”
I found one of the many for you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqFY3rICDWs at minute 7.15
He can’t play Yakuza 0 and puyo puyo tetris, because it can’t download the mandatory update, it can’t launch games. Technically it’s not bricked, but because it can’t launch legally purchased games, it’s effectively bricked.
It doesn’t even show the game icon on the screen!
False, too many games require internet access for the first start to download the actual games
Banned console = you can only play 1st party games as almost all 3rd party devs ship empty cartridges with no game inside
It’s already happened that Nintendo remotely bricked a switch 2 because its owner bought an used game, but that game was dumped by its previous owner.
You also have no intention of buying 100% genuine original, but used, games?
Switch 1 was feasible as its CPU was similar to the ones found on a $200 android tablet from 2018 so even a Chromebook can emulate that.
Switch 2 is comparable to a mid range modern gaming PC so we have to wait at least a decade for full speed emulation, if not more
I only tolerated watching reddit using the slide app, so no app = no reddit.
I deleted all my posts.
One day when browsing from a VPN they said if you want to see this page you need to login. I reluctantly login, to get an email a few hours later “your account has been permanently banned for suspicious login”
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Nice track record at FIFA
Russia 2018
Qatar 2022
USA 2026
Morocco 2030
KSA 2034
2038?
Since sensitive data was put on a public bucket, maybe they meant it was their lowest priority?