Well this is a particularly bad mistake at a quite inopportune time, I feel like. Silver lining, perhaps: a lot of crazy shit is unfolding in front of a public that is becoming more aware of how bad of an actor the current president is showing himself to be, and he might be in real danger of losing control of his base in numbers that matter.

Voting season will be a proving ground. I am hoping midterms have a strong and resolved response to this shit and the results are outside margins of error. I can’t accept the alternative, it’s too sad a prospect to really process right now. I really do think a fair vote will reveal the resilience of our democracy. I really fucking hope we have free and fair elections for midterms. I think we will, I hope beyond hope we do, I am asserting we will and now reality must bend to my will, we will. I hope.

Epstein files when?

Or discuss the singular El versus the plural Elohim and the related implications for that over the pantheon alluded to in the books of Moses.

But… I was trying to spread the love across the old religions and just leading off with a fun pairing. This Yahweh guy gets a lot of attention. Ra is displeased and unpleasant droughts will undoubtedly be visited upon us all now. Fuck.

Sure, but still no reason not to put it on display in clear and hamfisted terms if you ask me

This is the time to start invoking all of the gods for a more dynamic and adaptive office environment.

“Listen, Ryan, I’m gonna need you to ask yourself what Enki would do in this situation, ok? You’re giving Enlil when I need an Enki. Dammit, get your head in the game. Have you not been keeping up on this stuff? Seriously, if you’ve been experimenting with that Jesus stuff again I’m gonna come unglued, I swear. Get off the fuckin cross already, jeez.”

Aww, poor widdle fella. SAD!

That autistic person database oughtta come in handy once they decide they need to expand the ranks

I still care, there are dozens of us at least, please don’t stop highlighting these kind of connections

I want a strike force to go after the Epstein pedos

I said before the inauguration that they’d wait until just over halfway through the term before shuffling Vance in somehow. That allows Vance to have a chance at plausible deniability when the next 2 elections in a row are swung in his favor, thus giving him potentially 10 years to deploy the Curtis Yarvin techno-fascist playbook before even the most devoted acolytes finally accept what’s going on. I still think that is the techbro plan they hope to execute on. And I hope we can resist it.

Yes! My family could not get into it, I thought it was a riot

Ok but Epstein files when?

It’s been very “Hunger Games” looking for a while now, I couldn’t agree with you more

These people are cowards

That makes sense, thank you

Things keep happening so fast. What was going on from around Sept '23 through until April-ish of '24 when it flatlined?

Edit: when it flatlined the first time, not the TACO time

He quite literally was legally disallowed by Viacom (Comedy Central’ owners). Not CBS, where he told the audience he would love to bring the character back but was not legally allowed to do.

Irrelevant and refuted by Colbert’s own words, but ok. Viacom quite literally wouldn’t allow it.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/stephen-colbert-colbert-report-character-915236/

But on Wednesday night’s Late Show, the real Stephen Colbert indicated that Comedy Central’s legal team is barring his old character from appearing on CBS.

“This is true, immediately after that show, CBS’ top lawyer was contacted by the top lawyer for another company to say that the character Stephen Colbert is their intellectual property,” the real Stephen Colbert said on Wednesday.

He continued, “So it is with a heavy heart that I announce that thanks to corporate lawyers, the character Stephen Colbert, host of The Colbert Report, will never be seen again.”

The audience began to boo but the Late Show host insisted there was nothing he could do.

“I feel the same way, but what can I do? The lawyers have spoken. I cannot reasonably argue I own my face or name,” he said. “And as much as I’d like to have that guy on again, I can’t.”

If you’re into that scene, there is room for real overlap between those phenomena. If you’re not, it just sounds crazy. Both camps have their champions to spread the word.

Is Robert Bigelow doing real research, or just a fringe wacko? One’s personal feeling about the answer to that question probably correlates with one’s proclivity to give an article like this any real consideration.

Edit: spelong

I thought it was because Comedy Central had a claimed trademark or something regarding the character he played, but it’s been a while so I might be misremembering