Someone who doesn’t know shit corrected a woman who literally knows for certain without at any point considering that, perhaps, the woman is right.

Wouldn’t he need to have reason to believe (say, by being told she’s Signal’s president) that she knows for certain before this makes sense? A “no” wouldn’t convince anyone without that crucial bit of context I think, setting aside the insufferability of this guy.

Now fuck off the channel.

I’ll probably eat some mod action at this rate, but that’s a small price to pay to win an internet argument.

Edit: Holy fuck I take that back.