• TryingSomethingNew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Nice article on Meshtastic. The problem is that, like anything, the actual distance is a lot more dependent on line of sight and the actual mesh existing. Which means we’d need a LOT more people to adopt these and put up repeaters for them to be useful. Which is doable, but not cheap.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Have a look at meshmap.net. That shows people who have voluntarily put themselves on a map.

      Although it can be a serious underestimation, for example in my area, I’m the only one who lists myself on the map, but there are about 10 other nodes that don’t

      Edit: Also, the number of nodes on MeshMap has pretty much doubled in six months since I started playing with it.

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I always thought these were more like walkie talkies for messaging than telephones that you can call anyone.

      Like it would be good if cell serivce goes down.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        21 hours ago

        That’s pretty much exactly what they are. Text message in walkie-talkies. With the added benefit that if your friend can’t hear you, but another friend is in between, your message automatically gets relayed through their walkie-talkie.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Companies are starting to manufacture repeaters and they are not that expensive. You can get one for about 100 Federal Reserve Notes.

      • TryingSomethingNew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, I’ve seen some clever stuff where they take a solar powered light and wire in a Heltec V3 for $30-$40. But I thought one of the new upcoming standards (WiFi? Cell?) incorporated a mesh capability.

      • Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Sucks you can’t charge it and have to instead go to a central bank to exchange minted coins for notes that you can exchange for the commodity that is the radio.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        23 hours ago

        You can’t expect me not to reinvent the wheel.

        As we post on Lemmy, which is a reinvention of a reinvention of a reinvention of Usenet from 1979.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      At that point, given the extremely small bandwidth, we might as well just use a massive wifi, everyone already has the required hardware for that instead of producing more trash for a pretty much non-existing use case.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        pretty much non-existing use case.

        …for you.

        I can see a use-case where a low-powered off-grid communication device can be useful.

      • deafboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Ever since I switched to lemmy, I constantly stumble upon people trying to guilt other people for their hobbies. That’s pretty unhealthy.

        Whoever reads this, don’t feel guilty living your life. Spend time on whatever you’re passionate about. Build new things, even if they do not have a rational use case at the moment. They might play an important role in your future.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          WiFi goes down and people sometimes NEED to communicate instead of streaming Netflix.

          This is just an alternate channel, if Eheran doesn’t have the imagination to understand how low bandwidth can still be extremely valuable, as compared to, say, screaming at the top of your lungs to attempt to be heard 5 miles away, then… I’m not really interested in what they think.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            “WiFi goes down”

            Or more to the point, the ISP fails. A Wi-Fi router isn’t that much more difficult to power than a meshtastic node, but my old ISP, I don’t think they even bothered to install UPSes, if the power was out, so was the internet. I could keep my Wi-Fi up indefinitely, but it’s basically useless outside my house.

            • MangoCats@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 minutes ago

              Low power requirements, battery + solar power source… this isn’t science fiction anymore.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Funny thing about Wi-Fi, it overlaps with an Amateur radio band (the 2.4GHz spec does) and so hams are allowed to run Wi-Fi with no encryption but a tremendous amount of power and high gain antennas on like the highest channels.

          • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            A portion of the 5GHz WiFI band overlaps with the 5.8GHz ham band too. There are also a few WiFi radios that will also work above the US WiFi band where they can operate without interference from other license free devices. Those are used in the HamWAN network.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          I wonder how much you could Jerry rig up Wimax for these days. That’s like 30 miles of range. I remember thinking if I was only going within a 15 mile area of my place it would have been cool, but prices 10 years ago immediately made it a no.

          Edit: like it sounds dumb, but what prevents someone from picking up a used Wimax base station, putting it as an uplink from their router, then using a Wimax card to receive it? Could even maybe just rig up a small rechargable wifi box, that received the Wimax signal, then rebroadcasts it back out as wifi using your home network name/password. So anywhere near your home the antenna would just pick it up and rebroadcast, maybe just hook it to your cigarette lighter to charge so anytime your in the car it’s on. I assume most people would find it easier/cheaper to just buy a cellular card… haha. But hypothetically, I am curious what would make it not work

      • ilovepiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        In trying times you’re missing the big picture. If they were more commonplace, you’d have a decentralised communication network that can’t be shut down by the government.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Some people already are

        https://map.nycmesh.net/

        But the point of LoRa is in the name, long range. Wifi barely reaches outside my house. Also a WiFi mesh is dependent on a variety of complicated and proprietary networks and systems while meshtastic is entirely independent.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 hours ago

        You can have one or the other. If you choose high bandwidth, you’re going to get very short distance because you can’t do serious error correction, etc. If you choose long range, you’re going to get low bandwidth because you need to include error correction, etc. In the transmissions.