- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- politics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- politics@lemmy.world
The man accused of assassinating the top Democrat in the Minnesota House held deeply religious and politically conservative views, telling a congregation in Africa two years ago that the U.S. was in a “bad place” where most churches didn’t oppose abortion.
Vance Luther Boelter, 57, was at the center of a massive multistate manhunt on Sunday, a day after authorities say he impersonated a police officer and gunned down former House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home outside Minneapolis. Democratic Gov. Tim Walz described the shooting as “a politically motivated assassination.”
Sen. John Hoffman, also a Democrat, and his wife, Yvette, were shot earlier by the same gunman at their home nearby but survived.
Friends and former colleagues interviewed by The Associated Press described Boelter as a devout Christian who attended an evangelical church and went to campaign rallies for Donald Trump. Records show Boelter registered to vote as a Republican while living in Oklahoma in 2004 before moving to Minnesota where voters don’t list party affiliation.
Better start investigating crazy conservative nut jobs?
I religious conservative goes on a shooting spree? Shocked! Shocked I say!
Makes sense. Conservative shot democrats when they sided with conservatives.
Yet the right-wing are spewing how Boelter is a Marxist. Fucking red baiting bullshit. 🙄🙄🙄
This is the type of person that conservative culture produces.
Yup. Constantly enraged, misinformed and lives in an echo chamber.
Yet another death cultist goes on killing spree
Regressive, No need for so many words. Regressive sums up that type quite well.
Why’s he a shooting suspect and not a domestic terrorist?
He killed Democrats, not a scumbag CEO.
Not enough melanin
Correct me if I’m wrong, but targeted assasination of someone has never counted as domestic terrorism, unless carried out by non-state actors, just like the guy who attempted to kill Trump would not be a terrorist
You’re wrong. Targeted assassination of political enemies is the use of violence against non-combatants for political/ideological aims. It’s textbook terrorism.
They’re careful not to label it as terrorism because once you get on the back foot and admit that one white MAGA guy attempting (and succeeding) in killing a Democrat is terrorism then you have to admit that the tens of thousands of others who are threatening it should also be monitored and treated as serious threats - and they absolutely do not want to do that as they know that white conservatives are the majority of domestic terror threats in the US.
This is an insightful comment. Thank you for sharing that.
I guess that makes sense
I’m unsure what you mean by “non-state actor”, but Luigi is accused of a targeted assassination and is being called a terrorist.
Unfortunately, you are probably wrong. It seems that this guy killed them because of ideology. If that isn’t terrorism, then I don’t know what is terrorism.
Legally there’s nothing such as domestic terrorism in America; the label "terrorist’ is exclusively used for foreign entities.
Except for when it’s used for natural born citizens of course.
Like?
Well my boy Luigi is currently facing (trumped up) terrorism charges
Oh, TIL. It seems what I said only applies to federal law. Does Minnesota have similar anti-terror laws?
“Thou shalt not kill.”
“…well… I mean, if they’re a Democrat of course it’s ok to kill them.”
Yes I am so religious… Riggggght.
Christians got cucked by maga. Republicans got cucked by maga. The marines got cucked by maga. All of them either are too cowardly to do anything about it or too stupid to know they got cucked.
I love that cucking is becoming a known word; it is rather fun to piss off maga-types with it but… I don’t think you’re using it quiiiite in the correct context. Every place you used it just now could be replaced with ‘hoodwinked and sucked in’ and be much more accurate.
Literally, sure. But metaphorically, what they love and espouse has been taken over by another male.
Here’s an example. Trump made the GOP his own, fucked it, and together they brought American fascism to life.
Raping Lady Liberty isn’t a physical or literal act, but it is still a crime. Which do you suppose is bleeding more: her soul or her torn vagina?
On a side note, a severe lack of critical thinking in America is why we’re in this mess.
It’s amazing how many people use their religion to justify murder. I remember this guy killed his wife because he wanted to be married to someone else, and he was so Catholic he just couldn’t get a divorce. So he killed her. Now what’s strange is, if you ask most Catholics they’ll tell you murder is ALSO a horrible sin. Like. Go to hell sin. 100% going to hell. Where as divorce is… frowned upon? But it’s not as bad as murder.
The real answer to your unstated question is that they can (hopefully) get away with the murder and not be discovered. It would be nearly impossible to divorce without the entire community knowing.
Most christians (conveniently) forget the little jesus parable about comparing the priest publicly donating and praying in the street to the woman quietly putting a much smaller amount in the donation coffers. To the modern christian, being a part of the ‘in-group’ by publicly making everything about their religion IS the way they engage with their religion. If they were to be rejected by the ‘religious community’ ONLY THEN would they care.
Most self described Christians don’t really follow their religion very well.
Are you sure he wasn’t Anglican cause that’s some Henry VIII energy right there.
Make an example of him. Kidnap, torture, post it on youtube.
MURDERING people is how you KNOW he’s Pro Life!
Surprising absolutely no one
Religious people are all mentally ill.
This is what happens when they are armed.
Religious people are dangerous and are all ticking time bombs ready to “punish” people who aren’t afflicted with the identical mental illness.
What worsens it are the grifters who aren’t really religious, but feed these people’s beliefs to rise to power and/or steal their money.
They are not mentally unwell, they are criminally undereducated or even miseducated. To not have a mandatory national school curriculum, hell even a state curriculum should be a way bigger talking point. It would be too, but you know, education…
Criminally undereducated to the point of mental illness I say.
The Venn Diagram is basically a circle. I’d say all of these wanna be badass guys worship the same underlying psychological flaw. Comes in a lot of different flavors but there’s usually some serious psychosis going on with the “lone” wolf gunmen.
Religious people are all mentally ill.
I wouldn’t say they are for all religions…
But definitely the “true believers” of the Abrahamic religions, like if you read any of those texts and are 100% onboard its all real. Abraham was a schizophrenic who heard voices that told him to kill his son, had textbook visual and auditory hallucinations and obviously delusions of grandeur. It’s so fundamental it’s present in all the big branches, schizophrenic symptoms are viewed as a legitimate communication with God that are often commands that must be followed no matter what.
So some well adjusted people see it as “just a story” but if you sit thru that indoctrination your whole life and start hearing voices, there’s a good chance you see the voices as religious instructions.
It’s not just a story.
American women have fewer rights than their mothers.
This has never happened in America before.
This is the rest of us held hostag by mentally ill, violent people.
This has never happened in America before.
Yes it has…
If you think this is the first time a movement of Christians has stripped rights away thru a political movement, it makes me think you’re not aware of how long this fight has been going on.
Like, from the first colonies, expansion into new colonies, the revolution, the civil war…
At almost every major turning point of our country’s history, fighting off Christian extremists has been one of the few constants. They spent a couple decades working behind the scenes with both parties, but just because it was less visible for a while doesn’t mean it stopped and especially doesn’t erase our past.
Like…
You’re not wrong that it’s bad now, and I’m glad you realize that.
But people need to understand history to understand how to fight today.
Point of order: When have women in America have had less rights than their mothers before?
You realize women could hold bank accounts in America for most of the countries existence…
Right?
Then they weren’t, and then in the 1970s they were allowed again.
Same goes for owning land.
But if you want someone to explain stuff, you might want to ask nicely, it sounds like you want an argument. I don’t have time for that.
Point of order: why are you asking me to ask nicely when I literally asked according to Robert’s rules?
TIL about Robert’s Rules
Point of order: why do you think other people know about Robert’s Rules? I would guess most do not.
Keep being crazy, Lemmy.
I’m not religious. I’m sane. Hell I’ve been tested. 100% fit for trial no less.
No mental disorder here. Just clarity.
Cheers mate.
Religious people are dangerous and are all ticking time bombs ready to “punish” people who aren’t afflicted with the identical mental illness.
Idk sounds like some pretty heavy paranoia.
I find your faith… disturbing.
The USA is splitting. It is not about Republicans and Democrats anymore, nor is it really about Conservatives vs Liberals.
It is about the Faith-based community, versus the Reality-based one.
Personally I want to be on the side that has science and vaccines and no Invisible Friend in the Sky.
It’s the ruling wealthy class vs the rest of us. Everything else the elite making up scary stories to distract us from them stealing from us.
Slavery led us to civil war before and I believe they will use religion to start the next one
I am very smerprised. Is anyone else smerprised?