• misk@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Are you saying that if there was another store that you could move all your games to, with 10% cut, 10% discount for you and 10% discount for the developer you wouldn’t use it because Steam is so good? Take a look at your games library and imagine 20% of what you paid not going to Valve. Do they really provide good value for that money?

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Publishers have their own storefronts and… surprise, not a single one charges 30%, 20%, or even 10% less due to avoiding the Steam tax.

      And yes, I frequently am willing to pay slightly more to keep things in Steam. It means easier Steam Deck access, family sharing, Steam Link, and other benefits that I would miss out on via other platforms, even if they were cheaper (which we established was not the case).

      • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        For me that comes up to a couple hundred euros, definitely not seeing where that goes.

        Someone said here that Valve doesn’t chase profit at all cost because they’re a private company. We’re talking about pioneers of enshittification though, look what they’ve done to CS, Team Fortress 2 or Dota 2. They turned both into casinos for children, breaking cohesion and balance, just to chase the profits. Do you think those people run Steam ethically or with your interest in mind? Other companies would be crucified for anything similar but Valve gets away somehow.

        • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          None of those are games for children. Nor are they similar to casinos. Are you trying to argue that selling cosmetics in games is inherently unethical?

          • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Selling cosmetics via loot boxes is gambling. They market their video games to children (all rated 13+). Way to twist what I’ve said lol. Goodbye, I’m blocking all Valve shills for sanity lately.

              • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                I’m against all gambling, especially targeting kids. So yeah, we can get rid of gumball machines. Bad attempt at whataboutism because I’m no hypocrite.