Considering that pH plays a major role in teeth health and acid-reflux, two things that a significant portion of the population suffers from and can dramatically reduce quality of life, shouldn’t the pH of a food item be just as important as nutritional values?
I think it could be dangerous given the limited scientific literacy of the general public.
I can imagine a slew of issues where people treat it like fat/calories and assume lower is “better”, or where other people think it’s like a vitamin and high is “better”.
I think 95% of people wouldn’t look, but that last 5% would be a mix of people that use it to their benefit as you suggest and people that misuse it as I cynically assume.
But that kind of logic applies to all public information. And you are not wrong that it will be misused but that is happening to almost any thing really. Like the Carnivore diet which is being held as some secret to health, or alkline water, or “natural” bs, or raw milk, or “keto” and so on.
Informing the public is not always successful, but it is almost always a net positive. This is the same philosophy as OSS
As both a Carnivore and Keto person, it’s not that meat is magical, its that sugar is toxic.
Sugar is what now? That’s a bold claim without specificity.
Technically, everything is toxic. Sugar has an LD50 of about 30 grams per kilo of bodyweight (and I promise you’ll be throwing up long before you get there).
But sugar really is pretty bad for you, especially in the amounts some people eat it. It’s not “Toxic” though.