• GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Suppose that at a given moment a certain number of people are engaged in the manufacture of pins. They make as many pins as the world needs, working (say) eight hours a day. Someone makes an invention by which the same number of men can make twice as many pins as before. But the world does not need twice as many pins: pins are already so cheap that hardly any more will be bought at a lower price. In a sensible world everybody concerned in the manufacture of pins would take to working four hours instead of eight, and everything else would go on as before. But in the actual world this would be thought demoralizing. The men still work eight hours, there are too many pins, some employers go bankrupt, and half the men previously concerned in making pins are thrown out of work. There is, in the end, just as much leisure as on the other plan, but half the men are totally idle while half are still overworked. In this way it is insured that the unavoidable leisure shall cause misery all round instead of being a universal source of happiness. Can anything more insane be imagined?

    —Bertrand Russell, In Praise of Idleness, 1935

  • _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Manager: You’re right! AI Makes me as productive as half my team, so I’m firing half of them AND working a 4 day work week!

  • Lør@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Studies show productivity has a sharp drop off after 6 hours iirc

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Mine starts badly, tails off a little in the middle, and the least said about the end the better, but other than that I always give 100%.

  • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    We should get a 4 day work week anyway even with reduced hours. It is fucking ridiculous people think that it is possible to do anything but the simplest tasks actively for 8 hours without breaks and be productive. People who think that are either stupid or have never spent a single second analyzing what they do in their day. Practically all companies already operate with their employees getting all work done within a few hours and lounging away with tiny bits of looking busy throughout the day. Might as well let them go home and rest so they can have higher motivation, clearer minds and more productivity. It’s a win win.

    • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      4 days is kinda outdated, like how the $15 minimum is so long overdue it’s moot. 24 hours. 3 days working vs 4 days living. We deserve to live more than we work.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Absolutely agree. They wanna complain about entitlement. They think they’re entitled to 3/4 of all of our lives.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    We could have done this 150 years ago when oil gave us 100 times more energy back than it took to extract it.

    Humans are a defective species, we must see others suffer.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      To be fair, we kinda did. Don’t get me wrong, workers are still heavily exploited now, but we’ve come a long way since then. At least we have minimum wage and some degree of workers rights now, even if we still have a way to go.

      Hopefully this current productivity boom can continue to push us along that path without driving us further into techno dystopia.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Nah it’s just that the socio-economic system we’re stuck with that literally incentivizes ghoulish behavior that causes suffering. Change the system, change humanity.

        • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Well yes, ghouls were the ones who invented capitalism, but before that we had feudalism, which was even more ghoulish - but guess what, we don’t go around drawing and quartering criminals anymore, so it looks like I’m right. Change the system, change humanity.

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Nah, we just change the methods, the underlying mechanism is the same. For example, you need to win so you wrote “looks like I’m right”, instead of clobbering me. But that innate human need to triumph over the other is still there.

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    If AI is so productive, we should have Unuversal Basic Income, and free college/vocational education for anyone who wants it.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    No, no, no. They’ll just make it so that each of us is expected to do more since AI is “helping” us. Success under capitalism just leads to more work. The number has to keep going up. If they get their arms twisted they may give us a day off, but they will absolutely decrease the pay. My fear is that they would also go, “Oh, well, since you’re not working 40 hours a week, even though it’s the same work, so no benefits for you 🤷🏿‍♀️.”

  • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Meanwhile, in Germany: There are a lot of unemployed people, and there are a lot of people who want a four-day week, so what we desperately need is working longer hours.

      • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah, they just like squeezing out some more. Why should the efficiency gains of the last decades help the people, after all? No, what we really need is richer billionaires.

  • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    21 hours ago

    But then they couldn’t pay 1/2 as many people as they used to while still expecting the same amount of work to get done.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Not enough people talk about this.

      When I found out how that worked I was like

      “Lemme get this straight…they get whatever they want out of you, as long as they want, exempt from overtime, for a flat yearly fee? But of course you get benefits and vacation time you are socially stigmatized from using…Yeah that’s a scam.”

      What’s with the obsession with renting/owning people?!?

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Fair, but the guys a politician - beating dead horses is too often just part of the job.