• Lør@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I see your point, however, the Democratic party is not fascist. It does provide a clear difference from the GOP. Wether we like it or not, USA is a two party system. We need to be practical here, not ideological, or we just go fascist forever.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is a right-wing troll talking point. Don’t listen to it.

    Go to the Democratic primaries and move the party left. And then, no matter who gets the nomination, vote Dem in the general election. This is exactly what the nazis did to move the GOP to the right and it worked great for them, and it’s something we can emulate.

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Democrats used to be the racist pro slavery party. Then it got captured and turned into Roosevelts New Deal Democrats, which were obviously to the left of the Republicans. Not perfect, but they really did a lot of good.

    This can be repeated, but it takes a lot of work.

  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s no way to win political power in the United States without the Democratic Party or the Republican Party.

    Socialists and progressives will always have an easier time infiltrating the neoliberal Democratic Party over the fascist Republican Party.

    The longer the fascists are in power the harder it will be remove them from power because they will change the rules to maintain power.

    The optimal strategy remains to vote for neoliberals when the alternative is fascists because that is how to create time for socialists and progressives to primary neoliberals in the Democratic Party and win general elections.

    This meme is a continuation of the accelerationism we saw during the 2024 election. It supports the fascist cause by attempting to sabotage leftist’s best strategy and thus is pro-fascist. The user is prone to self-sabotage as they publicly admitted to not voting for Harris in 2024.

    If a fascist drinks at your bar and you don’t throw them out it’s a fascist bar. If a fascist meme ends up in your community and you don’t throw it your a fascist community.

    I am reporting this meme. And you all should too. I’m sick of self-described leftists backstabing me and every other minority group they pretend to care about because they’re mad about the 2016 election. I’m a trans, atheist, Jew. I’m close enough to the death camps for my liking thanks. You don’t have to like the Democrats, I don’t, but we do need to vote for them.

    I refuse to go quietly. I refuse to tolerate memes that shrug at my right to exist and throw fuel to the fire in the hopes that the fascists kill everyone faster. That’s not a real political position. It’s black pilled bullshit and it can fuck off.

    Hope that helps people stop tolerating this bullshit going forward.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    5 days ago

    Roosevelt did great things for Americans while still being capitalist. The needle can be moved left without violent revolution.

    “Both sides bad” is weak sauce.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      5 days ago

      Quick reminder that there were other things going on in the 20s and 30s. You know, the height of socialism in the West, a strong labor movement willing to burn down factories, stuff like that. The New Deal didn’t come because leftists played nice.

      • Yppm@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I feel like Western labour just doesn’t have any leverage anymore. The rich simply do not need us. They have outsourced enough labour that they really don’t care if we strike en masse. Like, shut down which factories? They’re all overseas.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s what they want you to think. Their own lives depend on Western labor. That’s who runs the ports, the railways, the warehouses, etc. Also a lot of high-tech stuff is still in the West.

    • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      5 days ago

      No, the new deal only came to be after violent protests, and was largely a betrayal of labor groups because it gave a much watered down version of what was actually demanded, all while Roosevelt broke the strike he promised to support while campaigning. Read “Labor’s Giant Step Forward” by Art Preis if you want a more detailed accpunt

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      5 days ago

      In addition to the points raised by some of the other comments I’d remind you of one uncomfortable truth. The business plot was attempted fascist takeover of America. That was thankfully put down because remarkably there was one honorable ex-marine they tried to involve the plot. That’s Smedley Butler. In the wake of that that attempted fascist coup basically nobody was punished. In large part because Roosevelt told them as long as they kept their mouth shut and didn’t block the New Deal he wouldn’t go after them. That’s basically the only reason it got through. Truncated as it was even then. Because most of the richest and most powerful people in the country we’re looking down the barrel of a gun otherwise.

    • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Have fun wasting your time doing this. If they only fucked over Burnie once I might agree with you.

      • Korne127@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Well, they will still try. They won’t give it up. But it’s not possible to win it against them, like the Tea Party won against less extreme establishment Republicans

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      If you had to go back almost a hundred years to find any kind of example, I’m just going to gesture broadly at the next hundred years and rest my case.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Both sides are varying degrees of the same ideology, give all the money to the economic elite so they bribe both parties into maintaining that policy above all other considerations.

      One side shrugs and calls it free market forces(D) as you suffer under that policy goal, the other points and laughs at you and says you deserve it®. That is the extent of our “freedom” under American democracy.

      • svtdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        One side appoints Justices that voted against Citizens United and one appoints Justices that voted for it. That’s a huge distinction.

    • RedPandaRaider@feddit.orgBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Roosevelt was the least bad president and was ruling during a time where the US ended up on the right side of a conflict. He still did not abolish capitalism or the American empire, nor did he have any intentions to.

      But that doesn’t make the democrats good, it doesn’t make one side better, it doesn’t make the US good.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        it doesn’t make one side better

        One side IS objectively better.

        That’s proven by economic stats.

        That’s proven by voting history.

        That’s proven by criminal conviction history.

        There is no debate which side is better if you’re even remotely interested in facts.

        You take the side that is better and you reform it by primarying the reps that won’t play ball for their constituents., sending a clear message to the reps that remain. That is how democracy works in its most effective form.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      can it be done again without another series of protests and pain the current era of capitalism?

    • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      With unintelligent comments like yours and all the discussions happening below meme threads, conflicts and violence is where we are heading to. I encourage you to learn more about the things you are talking about.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yep.

      All the keyboard warriors talking about revolution need to either pick up and gun and do it or get off their asses and help primary bad Dems to send a message and start the reformation process.

      No one who made it out of high school should be saying “both sides” because it’s a profoundly stupid and unproductive thing to say. Did we have masked squads disappearing people before January? Did our allies all hate us? Were we threatening fucking Canada? Were we paying tariff taxes?

    • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Both sides are functionally the same when it comes to the world. There’s barely a difference between domestic policy between the two American parties. One uses sweet nothing’s to try assuage your fears and the other uses Force and strongman techniques.

      Yeah the FDR Reformation came directly from FDR and we pushed through at his behest. According to my understanding of these politics at a time if The president hadn’t been FDR we would not have gotten those Reformations. Besides they hardly matter nowadays when they’re practically entirely Stripped Away. The last surviving one is social security and they’re pretty gung-ho about getting rid of that too.

        • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Couldn’t be bothered to read. Ad hominem attack. Excellent representation of the American voter.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            People who type the words “both sides” and then post don’t deserve to have their comments read.

            • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              People who are unable to read are one of the reason the United States is in the toilet.

              People who use fallacies so they don’t have to engage with the objective facts of an argument they’re not able to impeach are another reason the world is falling to facism

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    ITT is some progressives who put more time, energy and anger into bullying other progressives not to vote for a genuinely progressive candidate, than they do into trying to sincerely convince Republican voters not to vote Republican.

    There’s a logical fallacy at play in their minds where they think “Republican voters aren’t reasonable but progressives are, so I’ll spend my time trying to whip progressives into holding the Party line. Maybe cussing them out and accusing them of being complicit in the rise of fascism will help…”

  • Bud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s not the democratic party, it’s the US itself that is rotten. The dem are just another manifestation of the issue.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    …you didn’t say fascist…

    Maybe you’re not ready to hear this: Both sides are not the same.

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not true. It can be reformed the same way the republican party was deformed. By gutting it from the inside out and replacing all the dead weight.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    somebody said it nicely yesterday in a lemmy comment:

    we need to capture the dems and turn them into a socialist party,
    just like the fascists captured the reps and turned them into a nazi party

  • Korne127@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 days ago

    What is the point of this meme? I feel like the only thing this can produce is people to not try to reform and improve the democratic party and take it over (like the tea party took over the republicans). Kind of like these “give up climate change it can’t be stopped” posts that just benefits the big fossil fuels companies

    • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s the point, I’ve noticed a lot of the loudest, most active posters on Lemmy ultimately want one thing, which is progressives not to vote. Weird how that’s what the conservatives have relied on for every presidential victory they’ve achieved in the past half century or more.

      • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        5 days ago

        Votes are earned not freely given. Your vote is your voice. Definitely vote at the local and state levels where your voice can be the loudest.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          5 days ago

          And if you only want to give half a vote, give it to Trump and JD.

          (Because not voting is very similar to half a vote for the other guy.)

          • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            5 days ago

            (Because not voting is very similar to half a vote for the other guy.)

            Not voting wasn’t a vote for Trump. Did not voting for Trump mean a vote for Harris?

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              5 days ago

              Did not voting for Trump mean a vote for Harris?

              It would mean you wouldn’t have minded a Harris victory. The comment even explicitly said “half a vote” to reflect this.

              This commentary is frequently also accompanied with blaming Harris voters for things that Trump is doing…

        • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          First off, it’s four years, get your math right. Secondly, we only bomb browns, we just sell the bombs to anyone wanting to bomb whites. “Foreigner” and “non-foreigner” really have nothing to do with it. I think mainly we just feel really secluded over here and we don’t want to be left out of all the cool Europe and Asia and Africa happenings, this is just the only way we can express ourselves.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      What is the point of this meme?

      These memes communicate to Democrats and their supporters that we’re sick and tired of their mask-off conservative rule when they promise us the world and do nothing once elected. You want praise? You want votes? Then do something.

      Since, you know, not voting for them apparently isn’t enough to inspire meaningful change. Just once in my life I want to see Democrats fight harder for the working class and poor as they do against socialists and third parties.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        You want praise? You want votes? Then do something.

        Time for you to educate yourself. Look up Dem’s economic stats compared to Republicans. Look up the Dem’s voting history.

        They aren’t doing EVERYTHING, but they do a lot more than the other viable option.

        If you want them to do more, then stop wasting your time doing what you’re doing and start focusing on getting people to primary Dems who aren’t doing what we want, because that’s how you get Democrat party reform.

        This meme is utter trash and only serves to fracture liberals and prevent the reform I just described.

        Just once I want liberals to come together and primary bad Dems to send a message instead of fucking whining and not voting or voting 3rd party so fascists can take over.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Just once I want liberals to come together and primary bad Dems

          They did.

          That bad candidate was Joe Biden.

          The Democratic Party just ignored it. Democratic primaries are a worthless exercise.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s exactly it. This is the meme and attitude of tankies that are chomping at the bit for violence and doing everything they can to help push the country to the Right. This is because of their faith-based belief that it will magically create class consciousness and a revolution to overthrow the global bourgeoisie. They don’t give two shits about the LGBTQ+, POC, medically vulnerable, etc people that they have to sacrifice in the process.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      You are correct. The OP has an agenda and that agenda is to fracture liberals.

      The answer is not to give up. The answer is not to vote for a worthless 3rd party with zero chance of winning. The answer is to reform the Democrat party and history has shown us, repeatedly, that it is completely possible. And it literally just happened with the Republican party in the last 2 decades.

    • RedPandaRaider@feddit.orgBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      You should not attempt to reform something which is not reformable. Instead start something new.

      In general, you should not reform. Revolution is the way forward.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        You should not attempt to reform something which is not reformable.

        Pick up a fucking history book.

        Political party reform is entirely possible and has happened repeatedly in American history. Conservative voters just did it to the Republican party.

        Scrapping an established party with national sway for a 3rd party with NO clout and NO representatives in the House or Senate is fucking stupid. Especially when we have a national party in power currently attempting to dismantle our federal government to replace with an authoritarian one.

        Revolution is the way forward.

        Then do it. Big talk on the internet. If you think modern Americans are going to start a revolution, think again.

          • CMonster@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            We need to capture the dems and turn them into a socialist party, just like the fascists captured the reps and turned them into a anti-worker. I spent way too long in the army to have the illusion that the american people are capable of changing anything through other means. It will not happen.

            Not to be ignorant but I highly doubt you have the training, funding, or even the intestinal fortitude to do any of the things a revolution would entail. I also think that if you did find the courage it wouldn’t matter because when they drop a non-explosive shredder warhead through your window it’s all over. You have no idea what your asking people to do when there is a better way.

            • RedPandaRaider@feddit.orgBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              This reform is simply not possible. You cannot use the same methods as the far right and expect the same result but for a different ideology. They work differently, they’re based on different systems and beliefs.

              And you seriously underestimate the power of revolutionary warfare. Technological advances in military warfare have made things harder, but not impossible. In 93 Russians were in the streets fighting the Russian military to overthrow Yeltsin. They had the courage, even without the military training. On Vietnam a nation and it’s people successfully defended their freedom against a technologically superior army. And I don’t think I need to list how many coups and revolutions have appeared over the past 100 years. You can’t think it’s impossible looking at history.

              I am no billionaire able to fund a milita, nor am I a general. But when the time arises or rather if it arises while I live, I do have the zeal to kill and die for what I believe in.

              • CMonster@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                No, as I said I was in the military for almost a decade. I promise you I’m way more versed in the art of turning people into fertilizer than you ever will be. 1993 was 30 some years ago. The techg for killing people has improved drastically. You have no idea how many ways the US has to kill you. I saw things in 2005 that would still blow your mind.

                • RedPandaRaider@feddit.orgBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Technological advances do not change societal upheaval.

                  Revolutions don’t fight the military in symmetrical warfare.

                  Militaries can defect, they can be sabotaged, their bases besieged, their supply lines disrupted, their forces stretched too thin, etc.

                  In ideal circumstances no revolution would have to fight one united military. Parts would defect or declare neutrality. Those who fight have finite supply and finances. What will a soldier do when he runs out of bullets and more importantly rations?

                  But in the absolute worst case, it will either lead to a more bloody victory or the military would have to literally depopulate the country with lethal force to establish their rule.

                  Also the 90s are not so far from your 2005. The majority of the military equipment Russia uses today in Ukraine is the same as during the Black October in 93.

      • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        China produces ~65% of global smartphones. At worst US companies simply re-brand products from overseas OEMs, at best they’re using Chinese produced semiconductors and components to create original products.

        The rest of the consumer electronics market is pretty similar. If you believe modern China is communist then they are “doom-scrolling on their communist-produced smartphones” through a communist produced network infrastructure which you are, most likely, reading through a communist-produced screen.

        I would argue however that modern China largely split the difference between the USSR, which you are McCarthy-ing about, and the modern Russian Federation, which explicitly reformed into a liberal democracy with a capitalist market economy.

  • Triasha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The Republican party was a party of radical abolitionists and it was captured by the capitalists. The Democratic party can likewise be changed to something it is not currently.

    You can’t convince me of what may be by talking about what is.

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    We need to get involved at the primary level, not lament the choices we are left with when primary election turnout is hilariously low. I’d be surprised if the average voter even knows what a primary election is.

  • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    What the fuck are you talking about I’ve heard it a million fucking times already. Its all anti-Harris lefties talk about.

    Having fun with the fascism we’ve got instead? Thanks for that BTW. Real good. Really makes me motivated to fight for my rights when my follow lefties keep empowering fascists through inaction in the most simplistic and basic fucking democratic function of going to a polling place and voting once every 4 years for the lib that’ll beat the fascist.

    I really wanna go fight ICE in hand to hand combat and get shot in the fucking face knowing this probably could have been prevented.

    Also if you are going to complain that I’m not bagging on the centrist/liberal dems for losing because they refused to budge left: I fucking hate them too, you can both suck shit directly out of my asshole.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, there are a lot of stupid fucking idiots out there, including on Lemmy, that are going to do the same stupid fucking thing they did last time and either not vote or vote for a 3rd party candidate that cannot, under any circumstance, win. And we’ll descend even further into fascism.

      Lot of stupids. But as I scroll down these comments, the majority are calling this meme out for the stupid fucking bullshit that it is. So I still have a little hope. I’m sure that’ll get destroyed in the near future.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Progressives do vote for centrists. Centrists do not return the favor and vote for progressives. Harris didn’t lose because the left staying home; the left held their nose and voted for her, even though that loyalty is a one-way street. She lost because she was such a dog shit candidate that she couldn’t drive enough people who aren’t highly politically engaged to the polls. The only reason she lost the election was because of her own poor decisions. Stop blaming the left for the failures of centrist democrats.

      • immutable@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        This is the same frustrating conversation we had to have when people blamed Clinton’s loss on Bernie bros staying home.

        Even when we had concrete data that showed that a higher percentage of bernie voters voted for Clinton in 2016 than Clinton voters voted for Obama when he won the primaries.

        The data tells us over and over that progressive and demsoc voters show up in higher numbers for candidates they prefer less than centrists will when presented with someone ideologically further left.

        Are there people that wouldn’t vote for the centrist candidate, sure. But Mamdani is currently seeing how many centrists are happy to say “fuck strategy, I’m supporting cuomo!”

        I get why those that still have faith in the Democratic Party are upset about the defeat. But I also understand why leftists are tired of being told “vote for this compromise candidate” in every election and even when we do turn out getting scape goated for them running garbage candidates that fail to capture the further left elements AND tons of non-left voters who sat at home and didn’t bother to vote.

        • Genius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Liberals being dumb isn’t an excuse for us to be dumber. We’re supposed to be better than them.

        • Mniot@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Giving a shit is more work than not giving a shit. But voting for a candidate doesn’t mean you like them and it doesn’t bind you to supporting them. I can post “Harris is a cop fuck cops >:-(” after I voted for her.

          IMO the key is: how long does it take you to vote, and if you don’t vote what are you doing with that time that is more valuable and progressive?

          If someone told me, “I didn’t vote last election because I was campaigning 18 hours a day for native land rights and there was no way to get mail or reach a polling place” OK. I’m not blaming that person. They’re working way the fuck harder than I am to make the world better. If someone told me, “I didn’t vote last election because I barely survive on my three jobs and the GOP has made my polling place a 6 hour line that I have to drive to. I can’t even afford the gas to get there.” Yeah, that makes sense.

          But I never hear that from online progressives. I hear, “oh I didn’t vote because both parties suck.” “I didn’t vote because they didn’t support <progressive issue>.” “I didn’t vote because there’s no point.” These are all shitty answers. Better answer is: “I did vote for the Democratic candidate and I’ll always vote for the most progressive candidate available.” That’s the minimum effort.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Any American that isn’t braindead stupid knew what was on the line this election.

        And any American that knew what was on the line voted for Harris.

        You can blame Democrats all day, and they do shoulder some blame, but the majority of the blame falls on stupid fucking Americans that couldn’t rub some brain cells together, not a party that isn’t great at messaging.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          And what do you hope to accomplish by blaming the electorate? They’re not going anywhere. You can bitch about the voters all you want. But ultimately, if you fail to appeal to them, that just means you’re a bad politician. Complaining about voters is like complaining about the weather.

          • Genius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I can’t call Kamala Harris an idiot to her face, but I can call lots of voters idiots to their faces.

      • Redfugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        She lost because Dems stayed home, low turnout in key Democratic areas. No matter how bad you think she was as a candidate you’re not going to convince me that she was worse than the dog shit candidate that won, and that’s on the people that stayed home.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 days ago

          She was objectively worse. Trump represented his base. Kamala didn’t. Trump is objectively the better politician. He gave his base exactly what they wanted. She refused to, preferring to pander to wealthy conservatives instead. You can argue she had better policies, but you cannot argue that she wasn’t an absolute dogshit candidate. She was simply bad at being a politician and had no business being at the top of the ticket.

          You need to separate quality of policies from quality of candidate. You’ll never make any progress as long as you keep conflating the two.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            She was objectively worse.

            Today I learned a prosecutor with a doctorate in law who has committed no crimes and ran a campaign primarily focused on unity and inclusion is objectively worse than a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist who illegally attempted to overturn an election after inciting an insurrection and ran a campaign based on hate and fear.

            She refused to, preferring to pander to wealthy conservatives instead.

            She refused to lie through her fucking teeth to her base or make enemies of our fellow Americans to win an election. And she gave a podium to a prominent conservative that spoke out against Trump. Maybe not a great move, but not some betrayal.

            She also ran with virtually no preparation out of necessity.

            We can keep blaming Harris or we can start blaming stupid fucking Americans that jeopardized our democracy because she wasn’t the best candidate ever. Like, what kind of broken fucking brain thinks “well, she’s not that great, so let me gamble with a felon rapist traitor instead”?

            • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Reading comprehension. You’re confusing policies for candidate quality. Trump was a good politician with shitty policies. Kamala was a dog shit politician with ok policies.

              It’s pointless to blame the electorate because they’re not going anywhere. Or are you more of a Zionist type, who would prefer just killing the electorate if they don’t vote your way?

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            She was in-arguably the worst candidate because she lost. She wouldn’t have been the worst president.

            The bullshit is centrists blaming it on the left. We told them how to win, and they went a different way. We showed up for her anyways, but the shitty candidate lost.

      • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m blaming anyone who choose not to vote for her who were center or left of center. Anyone. As stated: if you are to my right or to my left and you explicitly choose not to vote for Harris and could have, you can suck shit.

        If you discouraged people from voting for her: you can suck shit. If you constantly criticized her and barely talked about how fucking dangerous Trump is in general political discourse: you can suck shit.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      What the fuck are you talking about I’ve heard it a million fucking times already. Its all anti-Harris lefties talk about.

      Uh, no. This anti-Harris lefty, like the vast majority of anti-Harris lefties, knows an outside strategy is insane and mostly right wing propaganda.

      Having fun with the fascism we’ve got instead?

      Maybe if there had been more anti-Harris lefties in the party, we would have had a viable candidate. The hardline centrists did this.

      makes me motivated to fight for my rights when my follow lefties keep empowering fascists through inaction

      Nope. The following is from a Pew Research study.

      The typology groups at either end of the political spectrum, Faith and Flag Conservatives and Progressive Left, are also the most politically engaged – that is, they voted at the highest rates in the 2020 presidential election, and they are most likely to say they post about politics on social media and that they donated to campaigns. The groups in the middle of the ideological spectrum have much lower levels of political engagement.

      So quit uncritically accepting the mainstream establishment excuses. Harris lost because she was a shitty candidate, not because the left doesn’t vote.

      you can both suck shit directly out of my asshole.

      Gosh, were you out campaigning for Harris? I just can’t understand how she didn’t attract more voters. Scolding voters seems like such a solid strategy. /s

      • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Uh, no. This anti-Harris lefty, like the vast majority of anti-Harris lefties, knows an outside strategy is insane and mostly right wing propaganda.

        I meant anti-Harris lefties who actively wanted her to lose to Trump. (Which TBH, if they were vocally anti-Harris when it was clear it was her or Trump, they did)

        Maybe if there had been more anti-Harris lefties in the party, we would have had a viable candidate.

        How? How would you propose that could have realistically happened?

        Nope. The following is from a Pew Research study.

        So quit uncritically accepting the mainstream establishment excuses. Harris lost because she was a shitty candidate, not because the left doesn’t vote.

        Did I say it was specifically because “the left doesn’t vote”? No.

        Its partially because more of them don’t vote compared to the last election.

        https://www.commondreams.org/news/harris-gaza

        https://www.teenvogue.com/story/kamala-harris-moved-right-did-it-cost-her-the-election

        https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-underperformed-three-demographics-1981222

        The ratios of progressives vs centrists who normally vote anyway is irrelevant. What is crucial is the percentage shift in voting behavior within groups election to election. Clearly this election centrist Democrats, Progressive Democrats, and left leaning indies failed to get out and vote compared to previous elections.

        Its not hard to figure out why but its not a singular reason.

        Now does some of the blame go to the Democratic establishment? ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY. But not all of it.

        Fuck everyone even remotely responsible. Just fuck them. I legitimately hate them. (Including Harris and Biden themselves)

        Gosh, were you out campaigning for Harris? I just can’t understand how she didn’t attract more voters. Scolding voters seems like such a solid strategy. /s

        I did actually, I traveled 5 hours out of state to canvass for her in a swing state. I was a different person then.

        I can tell you, I’m done now. Political action is dead for me. I don’t want to swim up a fucking waterfall anymore. I’m done spending my own time and money on this shit. Not enough people give a flying fuck. If it takes things getting critically apocalyptic-level bad for average people to move their dumb-fuck-asses and be politically conscious about what is going to happen to them when fascists win I can’t bring myself to care about them anymore.

        So you can go ahead and choose to not vote next election. I don’t care enough to argue with you on that now. Because now it wont be arguments convincing people, it’ll be catastrophic damage done to the country and their ability to put 2 and 2 together.

        The time of bickering for positive change is over. Now we get to see some mass death and material suffering. I already tried. I not putting more of myself in for a ride I very much did not sign up for and in fact tried very hard to avoid.

        At this point I’m just screaming into brick wall for a sliver of catharsis.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I meant anti-Harris lefties who actively wanted her to lose to Trump

          If you think that’s a large enough group that it had any impact whatsoever on the election, then you are insane.

          How? How would you propose that could have realistically happened?

          Well, for one we wouldn’t have nominated Biden and never would have been in that position with Harris. We might have also held Biden’s feet to the fire more, thus discovering his mental state long before election time.

          Its partially because more of them don’t vote compared to the last election.

          None of that says that “lefties” in particular didn’t vote for Harris. Left policy sells, so a further left Harris would have done better, but that’s the establishment’s fault, not leftists. It also doesn’t take a leftist to be against genocide.

          Now does some of the blame go to the Democratic establishment? ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY. But not all of it.

          That’s funny, because nothing you said before gave them any fault at all, and you definitely seemed in the mood to throw fault around.

          So you can go ahead and choose to not vote next election. I don’t care enough to argue with you on that now.

          WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING TO?